• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Lophophora species

Migrated topic.

Gone-and-Back

Esteemed member
Joined
Apr 20, 2012
Messages
852
Merits
50
There are a few different Lophophora species out there, and I was looking around on a live plant suppliers site to see that there are many others besides Williamsii that were categorized as entheogens. Are these other cacti in the Lophophora family active? Cacti such as Lophophora decipiens, or Lophophora diffusa or fricci?

I have always heard of only Williamsii being the active one.
 
i hear diffusa is active, though it has no mescaline.

i have not heard anything about the activity of other lophs.

would be fun to grow them anyways
 
What if you were to graph a diffusa onto a San Pedro? Would it start to produce mescaline like the cactus its attached too? Maybe it would start to produce more then the San Pedro, due to being a lophophora?
 
Gone-and-Back said:
What if you were to graph a diffusa onto a San Pedro? Would it start to produce mescaline like the cactus its attached too? Maybe it would start to produce more then the San Pedro, due to being a lophophora?
i don't think it would produce any alkaloids it didn't prior to grafting.
i might be mistaken, though i doubt it (if its true, it is a great idea)
 
Parshvik Chintan said:
Gone-and-Back said:
What if you were to graph a diffusa onto a San Pedro? Would it start to produce mescaline like the cactus its attached too? Maybe it would start to produce more then the San Pedro, due to being a lophophora?
i don't think it would produce any alkaloids it didn't prior to grafting.
i might be mistaken, though i doubt it (if its true, it is a great idea)

I dont know if its true, this is just purely speculation on my part. Someone with the know how and accesability to such cacti should give this a shot and extract from the diffusa, seeing if mescaline is present.

Or has anyone done this previously?
 
i am pretty sure it is confirmed diffusa has no mescaline.

you could still do an alkaloid extraction on it if you wanted..
 
joshisom said:
the other day i ate a 2.5 inch caespitosa defanatly active even at that small of a dose
caespitosa is williamsii.

i bet diffusa would be a great compliment with mescaline (based on that erowid report).
so it would probably be worth grafting on a bridgesii or what have you just so you could eat the whole thing :twisted:
 
Back
Top Bottom