burnt: The point is NOT to replicate the paleolithic diet. It's just a starting point.
"Yes basically certain organs like your brain NEED glucose because fat doesn't cross blood brain barrier."
The present study shows that the human brain adapts to the changes in energy supply as early as 3 days following initiation of starvation, at which time ketone bodies account for approximately one-fourth of the cerebral energy requirements.
During prolonged starvation, brain energy requirements are covered in part by the metabolism of ketone bodies. It is unknown whether short-term starvation of a few days' duration may lead to reduced brain glucose metabolism due to the change toward ketone body consumption. In the present study...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I would speculate this numbers increases with time but again this is NOT the point since, adding certain amount of starch you fill glucose needs directly.
And now let's play
Could you please provide studies that prove the following:
- There is a lot of evidence to indicate too much saturated fat causes all kinds of problems such as cardiovascular diseases.
- Although this is disputed, there are other associations like cancer.
- At the very least animal meat contains cholesterol and too much cholesterol is associated with cardiovascular disease.
You might want to read how these hypothesis were original done. Feynman would be MAD.
OK, this is the graph of heart deaths plotted against fat intake, produced by Ancel Keys in 1953. It's a beautiful curve, utterly convincing...
high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com
A low cholesterol diet is definitely a must nowadays. After all, your cholesterol and health go hand in hand. Eating too much high cholesterol food can give way
www.cholesterol-and-health.com
And hot dog isn't steak.
Quick notes:
- saturated being dangerous is at best debatable in nutrition circles today
- we can't discuss cholesterol as "cholesterol" (being calculated and all and the so called "bad" "good" cholesterol). Breakdown to HDL, LDL, tryglicerides, etc might mean something but you still have to believe the "lipid hypothesis" to find them dangerous. Anyway most "Paleo" followers have great markers. I can provide numbers (public forum) if desired.
Studies
Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease
http://www.ajcn.org/content/early/2010/01/13/ajcn.2009.27725.abstract - I know it's meta and therefore hard as fuck to analyze.
Links
The diet-heart hypothesis is the idea that (1) dietary saturated fat, and in some versions, dietary cholesterol, raise blood cholesterol in ...
wholehealthsource.blogspot.com
The diet-heart hypothesis is the idea that saturated fat, and in some versions cholesterol, raises blood cholesterol and contributes to the ...
wholehealthsource.blogspot.com
^^ Both sides of the medal, to be fair.
"All food choices are a trade off so you can't just say "these compounds are unhealthy so eating foods with them is a bad idea", which is basically the argument all these people are making. "
Everything is a trade off but some choices matter more or less. If a product contains for instance trans fat this iS EXACTLY my logic "these compounds are unhealthy so eating foods with them is a bad idea".
And honestly why are you searching perfection ? Like you mentioned there are trade offs ergo you don't have superfoods that could provide you with daily energy and have ZERO minimal effects when eaten in that kind of amounts. I
"You are made of the stuff"
polytrip: Sleep is indeed vital. Dark room, 8 (up to 9 and a halt according to some) hours.
Ljosalfar: Sorry for that
I must admit the only Chinese Martial Art I did was listening to Wu Tang. And watching Kung Fu series.
fractal enchantment: It's the fructose that is questionable. Isolated (HFCS) fructose is heavily researched for it's (possible) toxicity. The question is, how does the fruit fructose differ the the isolated one.
Most if not all food today is fried in vegetable oils and not saturated fat (lard, tallow, coconut, etc).