How would objective reality be distinguished within subjective reality?
Would it be that we know/think something to be objective reality when it is something we agree on?
So in other words, is objective reality seen from a subjective framework, a (subjective) reality that is very consistent with other parts of that framework?
Any confirmation of any objective truth could only be perceived subjectively.
Hmm.
When I say subjective reality I am talking about our inner world. Whats going on in our head.
When I talk about objective reality I am talking about the stuff going on outside our head (which is also in our head).
I don't think it comes down to agreeing on anything.
Those two worlds are for sure linked. Our thinking self depends on all that matter out there making us up. Our thinking self can be said to "emerge" from the activity and structure of our brain. It doesn't need to be much else really. Its not some other reality its a property of organized matter. That doesn't mean that all self awareness is the same there is probably differenes such as those seen with other animals.
We can maybe speculate that some aspects of consciousness are beyond our material (matter and energy) self but that is rather speculative. We can say with as much certainty as is currently possible that aspects of our inner world depend 100% on the structure and activity going on in the brain. We know this from all kinds of studies of brain damage, mental illness, brain surgery, strokes, epilepsy, hallucinations, optical illusions the list goes on.
So why get hung up on the semantics? Consciousness appears to be an emergent property of organized matter and we happen to call it subjective experience because its a decent description.
When we make a word or use a word to describe something that's where the agreement comes in.