It was just an article posted by a professor of astronomy.
It wasn't a serious article that was trying to be published so I do understand why the author didn't really cite anything. I actually wouldn't expect serious scientists or astronomer's to waste their time debunking all of this stuff because they really do have better things to do. But some have written about it such as the man who wrote that article.
And this one:
www.universetoday.com
This article attempts to debunk more of the doomsday prophecies. It does not discuss the dmt connection that people here rave about. Those are even vauger and make even less sense. Especially all that crap that Terrance Mckenna wrote about. His time wave thing is just stupid and he got wailed on for it by serious mathematicians.
Many of the claims about 2012 prophecies can be easily debunked if given time and effort.
Where is the basis for all this? I want someone to explain that to me. I don't see any basis. But people always accuse me of being closed minded and only looking at it from a scientific point of view. But I see no other way of looking at it. People keep pointing out websites and things but they are all loaded with crap. Whenever someone brings up a serious argument peoples reaction is "piss off scientist" and I am getting sick of that. Defend your arguments.
I don't know much about what Mayan scholars say about all this. But I doubt any honest scholars really think mayans are predicting the end of the world or a galactic shift in consciousness. The scholars who want to make money selling books and getting people interested in their research have a vested interest in publishing these rediculous books. I want to see peer reviewed articles by mayan scholars who back up these claims. Books from the metaphysics section at borders dont count in my world.
It wasn't a serious article that was trying to be published so I do understand why the author didn't really cite anything. I actually wouldn't expect serious scientists or astronomer's to waste their time debunking all of this stuff because they really do have better things to do. But some have written about it such as the man who wrote that article.
And this one:
No Doomsday in 2012
Apparently, the world is going to end on December 21st, 2012. Yes, you read correctly, in some way, shape or form, the Earth (or at least a large portion of humans on the planet) will cease to exist. Stop planning your careers, don’t bother buying a house, and be sure to spend the last years …...
www.universetoday.com
This article attempts to debunk more of the doomsday prophecies. It does not discuss the dmt connection that people here rave about. Those are even vauger and make even less sense. Especially all that crap that Terrance Mckenna wrote about. His time wave thing is just stupid and he got wailed on for it by serious mathematicians.
Many of the claims about 2012 prophecies can be easily debunked if given time and effort.
Where is the basis for all this? I want someone to explain that to me. I don't see any basis. But people always accuse me of being closed minded and only looking at it from a scientific point of view. But I see no other way of looking at it. People keep pointing out websites and things but they are all loaded with crap. Whenever someone brings up a serious argument peoples reaction is "piss off scientist" and I am getting sick of that. Defend your arguments.
I don't know much about what Mayan scholars say about all this. But I doubt any honest scholars really think mayans are predicting the end of the world or a galactic shift in consciousness. The scholars who want to make money selling books and getting people interested in their research have a vested interest in publishing these rediculous books. I want to see peer reviewed articles by mayan scholars who back up these claims. Books from the metaphysics section at borders dont count in my world.
