wolf8312 said:
I would agree with this. Psilocybin even by itself is very like Anahuasca though nowhere near as healing and brutally therapeutic (rue). Honestly for me Psilocybin contains everything that DMT does and more (which makes sense structurally) but I'd say that psilocybin is more dangerous psychologically than Anahuasca/DMT and in terms of duration of the experience.
I feel you really are being unjust to mushrooms. They are an extremely well researched and much used entheogen, with tens (hundreds) of thousands of years of human use, and they are much more prevalent than various forms of DMT in today's psychedelic subculture as well...
My personal experience is that unlike LSD, mushrooms seem to "have your best interests at heart". By no means do I want to imply that a shroom trip might be without risk, but in comparison, it's one of the most "well moderated" substances around..
wolf8312 said:
You’ve got to be very careful you don’t fall victim to psychosis and delusions with mushrooms -just as you may with LSD- and I would advise anyone wanting to push to the outer extremes of the psychedelic experience to do so with the much safer/shorter DMT and not attempt to go to hyperspace with mushrooms. I believe fully it to be possible but six hours there? People will crack up!
Not on mushrooms they won't.

LSD, shrooms and DMT are similar, but ultimately very different experiences in terms of emotional charge.
Generally, "pushing the outer extremes of the psychedelic experience" is always risky, especially because such ambitions tend to have their roots in various negative emotions, a lack of faith in oneself, escapism, fear of death, fear of life, alienation and lack of aim, etc... That tends to come back to haunt people during and after the trip.
Picking out probably the least jarring entheogen around, and calling it "less safe" than others is just pointing fingers in the wrong direction.