gibran2 said:
I don’t think the problem was with the accuracy or predictive value of his model. I think the problem was a mathematical error.
Something like saying that x*x = x^3 (of course, a much more complicated error, but you get the idea).
Ahh okay, I got it. Intersting that the theory's accuracy as well as its predictive value apparently holds up, but the math is off....hmmm. Seems like a contradiction, or perhaps a paradox?
Conceptually it makes sense to me. I've long had an affinity for an Octave of dimensions, which corrlates with music and the vibratory nature of the universe.