I share this from my empathy.
We use words to communicate with one another, but sometimes we use them as terms, and as such, these terms help us categorize things in a way that helps us feel as though we have an understanding of the situation and context in question that the term is applied to.
I am starting to wonder if many are led astray and impacted by the power of suggestion by the use term 'breakthrough' at this point in time. As DMT becomes more popular in the societal milieu, certain phrases and terms become more prominent within the groups that talk about it. Often, these terms come from a small pool of source, but end up impacting and effecting a larger pool of people who may or may not be as “in the know.” I have noticed, that based off of either a small pool of people or from a popular source, specific niche information makes it into the wider subset of people interested in such topics. People's expectations are altered by this. So there become instances where people expect certain aspects and events before calling their DMT experience a 'breakthrough.'
An example would be how many are under the impression that if they can still be in touch with their bodies, then they probably didn't breakthrough. It's not comprehensive. The term breakthough reflects a certain level and intensity of experience (and from my experience, there are many layers and levels to what I'd call breakthrough experiences), but won't always have the same indicative aspects to identify it as such each time. The DMT experience may very well be infinite, and as such, there's an infinite number of permutations of variables and aspects of hyperspace. DMT always has something new to show you, and the 'breakthrough' experience, while appearing to have some intersubjective clout, is still largely subjective, and as such, many definitions are not facts nor objective. In all of your interactions with DMT you may never enter a waiting room, or see a chrysanthemum, etc.
Lastly, there seems to be a preoccupation with 'breaking through' when so much can be gleaned from “lower” levels of experience as well. It's not always about reaching the pinnacle, but basking in the entire paradigm as a whole.
Simply, do you. Define it for yourself. If it's an intense experience, and there were entities, and your consciousness was doing things that it's never done before (or at least never touches outside the space), and you experienced alterations of some kind that you've never come across before, and it's 'vivid,' then it's probably safe calling it a breakthrough. However, what's more important, is whether or not your experience fulfilled you and covered your goals for your journey. Be clever in how you describe the depth of your personal experience.
Be well.

One love
We use words to communicate with one another, but sometimes we use them as terms, and as such, these terms help us categorize things in a way that helps us feel as though we have an understanding of the situation and context in question that the term is applied to.
I am starting to wonder if many are led astray and impacted by the power of suggestion by the use term 'breakthrough' at this point in time. As DMT becomes more popular in the societal milieu, certain phrases and terms become more prominent within the groups that talk about it. Often, these terms come from a small pool of source, but end up impacting and effecting a larger pool of people who may or may not be as “in the know.” I have noticed, that based off of either a small pool of people or from a popular source, specific niche information makes it into the wider subset of people interested in such topics. People's expectations are altered by this. So there become instances where people expect certain aspects and events before calling their DMT experience a 'breakthrough.'
An example would be how many are under the impression that if they can still be in touch with their bodies, then they probably didn't breakthrough. It's not comprehensive. The term breakthough reflects a certain level and intensity of experience (and from my experience, there are many layers and levels to what I'd call breakthrough experiences), but won't always have the same indicative aspects to identify it as such each time. The DMT experience may very well be infinite, and as such, there's an infinite number of permutations of variables and aspects of hyperspace. DMT always has something new to show you, and the 'breakthrough' experience, while appearing to have some intersubjective clout, is still largely subjective, and as such, many definitions are not facts nor objective. In all of your interactions with DMT you may never enter a waiting room, or see a chrysanthemum, etc.
Lastly, there seems to be a preoccupation with 'breaking through' when so much can be gleaned from “lower” levels of experience as well. It's not always about reaching the pinnacle, but basking in the entire paradigm as a whole.
Simply, do you. Define it for yourself. If it's an intense experience, and there were entities, and your consciousness was doing things that it's never done before (or at least never touches outside the space), and you experienced alterations of some kind that you've never come across before, and it's 'vivid,' then it's probably safe calling it a breakthrough. However, what's more important, is whether or not your experience fulfilled you and covered your goals for your journey. Be clever in how you describe the depth of your personal experience.
Be well.
One love
