Thats a good idea of researching plastic leech with mass spectrometry. The problem is that all of these tests cost money and time and effort. So they may happen, but dont hold your breath while waiting
I think though, that you guys (girls?) are actually missing the important point that was touched on earlier, which is, while plastic may all around us, it is a COMPLETELY different thing to talk about consuming a product which was achieved by using a
non-polar solvent that was stored or came in contact with the plastic. People using aromatic or hallogenated solvents or people doing warm pulls are clearly at more risk. Unsafe and honestly stupid suggestions like using ziplocks as separatory funnels (as seen around the net in some teks) add a lot to the risks, as well as others in general using unknown type of plastics or plastics known to be incompatible with given solvent.
Also, saying plastic is all around us is a "bail out card" that could be used for justifying anything unhealthy or negative. What is the limit to this kind of argument? "Oh whats the problem of smoking cigarretes, we're anyways daily being subjected to toxic compounds from cars or potential dna-mutating cosmic rays".. Or "whats the problem of throwing this toxic product down the river, the industries anyways already polute the world way more than me". I know this is not what you're saying and i can see you are all reasonable people
but just leading the kind of argument to other contexts and to its logical conclusions. So having some very indications that it
could be a problem, and not knowing beyond a reasonable doubt that the problem is in fact insignificant, as well as considering that changing for glass for extractions IS possible and not unreasonably difficult or expensive, why not?
I know personally I have seen peaks of phthalates in mass spectra of extracted alkaloids, but I cannot say for sure from what part of the process the phthalates have come and exact amounts, because I wasnt controlling those variables, my focus was another one and the products were not to be consumed.
I think 'disseminating proper information' is what we are doing, dont you?
Nobody is saying for others absolutely to not use plastics or inventing horror tales, we are just saying the facts and, while we havent studied the exact variables and amounts of leeched components to then be able to extrapolate safety conclusions from known toxicity data, I think it's better to err on the side of caution and advice against using plastics for extractions, as we have done in this thread.