I'm sure this has been addressed before, and better, but I'd like to state the following:
The fact that hoasca is allowed to be drunk by religious groups such as the Uniao do Vegetal and Santo Daime but not by non-religious people ... this isn't fair.
We all deserve to be treated equally by the law, no? Yet it's not so. Religious groups think that a man in the sky wants them to drink a magic tea -- and so the government lets them drink. More grounded people think that the tea isn't magic -- that magic doesn't exist -- but that the tea is deeply beneficial to mental health -- and the government doesn't let them drink.
Isn't it weird that the way you think determines how you're treated by the government? There's a thought test going on here. And it's extra backward because the government is almost encouraging people to think magically. Think magically ... get special rights. Think in terms of evidence ... get shut down.
The fact that hoasca is allowed to be drunk by religious groups such as the Uniao do Vegetal and Santo Daime but not by non-religious people ... this isn't fair.
We all deserve to be treated equally by the law, no? Yet it's not so. Religious groups think that a man in the sky wants them to drink a magic tea -- and so the government lets them drink. More grounded people think that the tea isn't magic -- that magic doesn't exist -- but that the tea is deeply beneficial to mental health -- and the government doesn't let them drink.
Isn't it weird that the way you think determines how you're treated by the government? There's a thought test going on here. And it's extra backward because the government is almost encouraging people to think magically. Think magically ... get special rights. Think in terms of evidence ... get shut down.