Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Reply to thread

Message

i hear you, what I was trying to say is.

if there was a protein your body needed, and it was protein sl-2, gotten from a plant, and there was a synthesized protein, pnln4-sl-3, that fit right into your bodies production of sl-2, and could actually be used in place of sl-2, that doesn't by any means mean that considering that relationship, that it's likely that pnln4-sn-3 is a very logical organic molecule, and could be found in nature.

this whole statement is the basis of me thinking it would be readily produced by a plant in the right situation. And trust me, I don't feel offended by what you're saying, people on the shroomery spent hours saying "this shit is stupid, who would think of this" then when I'd tell them they were assholes, they said I was flaming them.:?

everyone has their opinion, I'm no chemistry expert. As long as there's no name calling, everyone is free to agree or disagree with whatever they want.

that's the rules, right?

<blockquote data-quote="imachavel" data-source="post: 3217907" data-attributes="member: 644">i hear you, what I was trying to say is.&nbsp; &nbsp; if there was a protein your body needed, and it was protein sl-2, gotten from a plant, and there was a synthesized protein, pnln4-sl-3, that fit right into your bodies production of sl-2, and could actually be used in place of sl-2, that doesn&#039;t by any means mean that considering that relationship, that it&#039;s likely that pnln4-sn-3 is a very logical organic molecule, and could be found in nature.&nbsp; &nbsp; this whole statement is the basis of me thinking it would be readily produced by a plant in the right situation. And trust me, I don&#039;t feel offended by what you&#039;re saying, people on the shroomery spent hours saying &quot;this shit is stupid, who would think of this&quot; then when I&#039;d tell them they were assholes, they said I was flaming them.:? &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; everyone has their opinion, I&#039;m no chemistry expert. As long as there&#039;s no name calling, everyone is free to agree or disagree with whatever they want.&nbsp; &nbsp; that&#039;s the rules, right?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="imachavel, post: 3217907, member: 644"] i hear you, what I was trying to say is. if there was a protein your body needed, and it was protein sl-2, gotten from a plant, and there was a synthesized protein, pnln4-sl-3, that fit right into your bodies production of sl-2, and could actually be used in place of sl-2, that doesn't by any means mean that considering that relationship, that it's likely that pnln4-sn-3 is a very logical organic molecule, and could be found in nature. this whole statement is the basis of me thinking it would be readily produced by a plant in the right situation. And trust me, I don't feel offended by what you're saying, people on the shroomery spent hours saying "this shit is stupid, who would think of this" then when I'd tell them they were assholes, they said I was flaming them.:? everyone has their opinion, I'm no chemistry expert. As long as there's no name calling, everyone is free to agree or disagree with whatever they want. that's the rules, right? [/QUOTE]