There is a subjective way to study plants, it's called dieting. I know this way of relating to plants is embraced by a minority here.
Relationship vs mechanical chemical effects.
When your energetic makeup is just random, the way you percieve the effects of a plant is blurry and erratic. When you go in a diet everything clears up and a consistent picture forms. İf there were no consistent character to Ayahuasca, how would anybody be able to master it and be a curandero, taita etc?
There is still an infinite variability within the consistent character; the experience is not mechanistic or reducable and is alive. Still, chacruna will never give curvy visuals like chaliponga, chacruna will always be more direct in teachings than chaliponga.
How about doing the double blind test in proper dieting conditions? Clear up and sensitize, and make space for the spirit of the plant.
Relationship vs mechanical chemical effects.
When your energetic makeup is just random, the way you percieve the effects of a plant is blurry and erratic. When you go in a diet everything clears up and a consistent picture forms. İf there were no consistent character to Ayahuasca, how would anybody be able to master it and be a curandero, taita etc?
There is still an infinite variability within the consistent character; the experience is not mechanistic or reducable and is alive. Still, chacruna will never give curvy visuals like chaliponga, chacruna will always be more direct in teachings than chaliponga.
How about doing the double blind test in proper dieting conditions? Clear up and sensitize, and make space for the spirit of the plant.