• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

----

Migrated topic.
It's a good question but I really doubt you're going to get any serious answers 😁

I think what you can get from dmt depends enormously on maturity and maturity does have something to do with age (but not necessarily a lot).
 
like anyone really cares about age and experience.
world would be 180 degrees reverse if anyone did (beyond lip service.)

not to be harsh, but age and experience is worth essentially nothing these days/
 
age and experience are absolutely relevant i agree.

just on a tangible level in 2015 , its worthless,
and possibly a handicap.......

college educated? several degrees? military decorated? world travelled , high IQ?
means nothing,
its roadkill to an 8th grade dropout who just won the lottery and bought a new hummer!

^age brought me that wisdom.
 
Personally, I like to judge the quality of posts and information here by what is said, not who said it or how old they are. Age is just another way to reinforce blinding predjudice in your subjective interpretation of information.
 
It's my feeling, from hanging around here for quite a while now, that ages range all over the board among active members. I agree with NotTwo, very few serious answers on this one :lol:
 
KillaNoodles said:
A wise, old, well-traveled philosopher, is absolutely worth lauding more than the young, apprentice philosopher. And he very well might wish to place himself in an apprentice's role.

You're conflating age with experience. You could take a 50 year old who has taken DMT once, and a 20 year old who has smoked it hundreds of times. I would tend to treat that 20 year old as a more credible source on the subject.
 
Global said:
KillaNoodles said:
A wise, old, well-traveled philosopher, is absolutely worth lauding more than the young, apprentice philosopher. And he very well might wish to place himself in an apprentice's role.

You're conflating age with experience. You could take a 50 year old who has taken DMT once, and a 20 year old who has smoked it hundreds of times. I would tend to treat that 20 year old as a more credible source on the subject.

Hmmmmh, not sure if we can buy that, KillaNoodles wasn't talking just any 50 y.o ...... ..... guy, but a wise, old, well-travelled philosopher?
 
KillaNoodles said:
A wise, old, well-traveled philosopher, is absolutely worth lauding more than the young, apprentice philosopher.
"Wise, old, well-traveled philosopher" sounds like a character straight out of a Disney tale. You must be quite young to still believe in that. :lol:

KillaNoodles said:
By that same token, an older person who has squandered his opportunities may be well beneath a younger person who has capitalized on his own. We are in agreement, you see.
Anyone who judges one person above or below another, implicitly places himself above both. I don't like the smell of these sorts of judgements.
 
KillaNoodles said:
hug46 said:
Why is there brackets of 10 years in the ages up until 55? Is 55 the wrinkly event horizon where age no longer becomes important?

Don't you know?

samsara.jpg

No i dont. Can you elaborate?
 
Back
Top Bottom