[this is a book I'm actually writting, willing to post the draft chapters so that i spread my findings to scientists and amateur thinkers.
[note: I'm trying to trace all of the robber and slaver ants, parasitic birds, and parasitic bees and similar species that have this origin behavior of exploiting. My theory I've been thinking about is this: that there's a single "slaver species" and while it's hard to wrap your mind around i think this correlation as a marker for forensic thinking to look at clues. I'm trying to look at whether or not this traces back to a single species that branched off and separated and then diversified and evolved or if one species did perform what we might call or consider "Slavery" but then we consider whether there's other species that are just mimicking that older and more ancient behavior or if it independently evolved on its own throughout time? An important implication for humanity This implication is potentially a source of information on how to diverge from it without just "feeling" like it or summing it up as "good and bad"; and I specifically believe that this behavior will lead to human extinction if we do not diverge from this highly outdated form of structure in ecology and human nature I believe that something like one really bad war could wipe it all out or one miscalculation could lead us to project a fight or die response which probably would normally save life in a survival situation.. but you can see how generative AI and nukes complicate that innate evolution and adaptation in a highly intelligent species (humans are believed to be the most intelligent and I have a lot of theories on why and why not and how some people are and aren't; largely stemming from social structures and emotion; I have a strong sense that maternal love is a huge part of it and community support; as opposed to competition or die)]
[I especially want to look at the parasitic bee's of the western united states and the correlation between U.S. colonialism with regard to what happened to the indigenous people and how they'd been pushed west and I want to look at ecology in the western united states and the eastern half and compare and contrast that and look to U.S. indigenous/colonial history and see if there are parallels. this can be a highly contested area of debate because it's nearly impossible to source these species ancestors and whether or not they followed colonial humans or whether or not they were invasive or whether or not they were naturally evolving along side their target species that they rely on. it's also controversial especially because it's similar to the era of eugenics. I think that is actually a whole part of scientific history that is related as a single yet potentially repeatable event. I genuinely believe that there's this concept of "Good" in people and I also genuinely believe the concept of "Evil"; at least conceptually]
[Overview] [note: each thing can eventually be expanded down into a volume of detail but only through research]
1) Introduction
[note: a general introduction to the concepts of a single species that exploit, domesticate, and enslave "indigenous" or "native" populations; and that branched off and diversified and possibly went extinct only for that adaptation or evolution to independently evolve as a reactive mimicry from other species. The introduction implies that there is a common ancestor dating back to this behavior in nature, the world, human nature, our "relatives" on the tree of life, etcetera- but specifically looking at this particular connection to other genus and species; such as Hymenoptera, primates, birds, and many other species. The scope of a project like this is massive and especially with the risk of extinction at hand with unsustainability and its cultural and sociological structures; it's harder to compile that information completely and to understand and trace back our Earth's often brutal history. I hope to at least in this thread to reference a wealth of information to look into; seeing as a large community encompasses this forum; seeing it as a "commons" to everyone and not one person's since it serves to support the drive to research]
2) Chapter one: Enslavement and exploit in bees
3) Chapter two: Enslavement and exploit in ants
4) Chapter three: Enslavement and exploit in humanity
5) Theories on Cetaceans
6) Chapter four: The pharmaceutical industry as exploit and enslavement
7) Chapter five: The fossil fuel industry as the road
8) Family tree of bee's, ant's, humans with maps, figures, and graphs dating back to common ancestors and where they lived. [note: I understand that on some of this there's like no information for it but I know that looking at the fossil record these prehistoric Hymenoptera are larger so what specific ancestor are these kidnapper, robber, and slaver ants dating back to to figure out how it evolved?]
9) essay(s)
10) contributing essay(s)
[note:] more to come, I'm trying to make this essential to forensic anthropology and also to forensic architecture in relation to both fields being multi-disciplinary. I plan to specifically have essays on the pharmaceutical and the fossil fuel industry and see if any of it relates to nature as a behavior but also I'd like to examine working conditions of laborers to see if this behavior has just become more mild and takes a form in waste, work place discrimination, and things like that as though we're bouncing from biology through forensics and into sociology and psychology where we rebound into reflection.
11) the war, riot, protest, and emigrate response
[note: will keep expanding chapters. The author does have ADHD and ASD and works full time]
A counter cartography of the modern world
introduction.
ExxonMobile knew about the risks of climate change before we did. Bill Gates had access to code before anyone else. Whites in the United States had a significant advantage over non-whites because of slavery, forced removal of the indigenous, and because of the privilege of accessing, using, enforcing, and encompassing better standards of life than our counter-part human beings. I’d like to go back to Exxon Mobile and their knowledge for a moment and then we can split into a larger concept to play with.
ExxonMobile knew about climate change. They also were the one’s mining oil. Fossil fuels had direct links to wealthy families who’d made their money off Valium and Percocet, coal, clothes, land, minerals, exploitation in labor, and more. The fossil fuel had brought all these things about to the world. They carried the Valium and Percocet to our pill bottles and made the very container made out of petroleum formed into plastic. They didn’t just know about climate change; they knew about geology, climate, physics, psychology, sociology, and all other forms of multi-disciplinary ways to coerce out the world as they saw it for themselves and how they wanted it to be despite how that world affects others.
ExxonMobile likely found fossils. That very discovery tells us that the planet isn’t what we think of. It also shows to an impulsive individual how we “must” be the one to decide it all since we are here and they are there and ExxonMobile likely had to know that this oil was an organism. From there: who discovered the meteor smashing into the planet before we did? Then, from that discovery of what killed so many organisms and transformed them into a fuel containing and trapping their carbon as a compressed and transformed material inanimate? That may have also meant that this large meteor that destroyed the age of Jurassic wasn’t the only point in time for the energy web to form into a source and not through an ecology.
[Note: Theory: If ExxonMobile had more knowledge and intelligence before everyone else did about multidisciplinary approaches, before it was discovered by scientists; that may have given them a practical advantage to set the stage for themselves. It allowed them to remove information they didn’t like until they had the advantage of knowledge. That allowed them to sustain their competitive, and practical, and also literal advantage.
ExxonMobile didn’t just know about climate change and what would happen if we continued to burn them for transportation, energy production, and luxury; but they also knew about more. You had to have knowledge on a brilliant variety of concepts before being able to establish and install the function that fossil fuels serves society.
Now we’ve got a mountain of trash and it’s not a resource. The trash is placed in poor countries as a dump where actual people live. Now the trash is floating in the ocean in gyros; like 8 of them or so…
They know about humanity, and they know about the Earth, and they have discovered fossils only to study and destroy them, they researched better than any other scientist and transformed the massive profits into shell companies to produce this research in dark because if people learned of an intentional enslavement through the established and manufactured dependence of their source of advantage; then people could respond not react. It almost sounds like I think that they are the descendants of a group of primates whose purpose is to enslave other primates and to not perform their own work by using a system of logic specific to slaver-primates… ]
[Note: Theory: taking similar logic but applying that to the competitive advantage the for profit pharmaceutical industry wouldn't that also mean that many of these corporations are also putting their research into taking advantage of markets and finding the proper location to set up their operation (maybe even a lot like a weird trap or functioning like a trap)]
[Note: these are just implications and theories on relating it back to humanity and we also use the term "slaver" as a larger behavior that humanity took part in and still do so today both literal/criminally and conceptually] [note: yes, today in the modern world slavery exists. There's people being enslaved. There was an illegal cannabis grow operation that used slave labor for production that i remember hearing about, it happened in the UK and there was a wealthy couple that had enslaved a boy, an African immigrant and he was somewhat recently released and freed at 60-something and the couple that did that got into trouble for it but the man was like 60 or 61 years old once he was freed- i'm going to look up those two things and re-edit the post later. This is also not mentioning human trafficking in modern slavery. We also aren't totally drawing lines to emigrating out of the country and slavery we think of things like the roads that African and (parallel) South American migrants take and die on. We want to contrast the times when people do become disappeared or whose bodies are discovered with enslavement and we want to contrast "the road" with "the slave" and "the slave driver" whenever we think about this forensically]
There’s a lot of other animals that have independently evolved this trait and seem to be fully separate species that independently evolved like that of the Slaver-ants, parasitic birds, parasites in general, and indeed parasitic bees like the Parasitic genus(s): Coelioxys, Dioxys, Epeoloides, Epeolus, Ericrocis, Holcopasites, Melecta, Neopasites, Nomada, Oreopasites, Sphecodes, Stelis, Townsendiella, Triepeolus, Xeromelecta, and Zacosmia. Some of these have a single host where as a few have been more colonial and target more than one up to three for Dioxys (Anthidium, Megachile, and Osmia), two for Nomada (Andrena and Nomia), and same for Stelis (Heriades and Hoplitis). Coelioxys also targets Megachile too. Epeoloides targets Macropis, Epeolus targets Colletes, Ericrosis, Melecta, Xeromelecta, and Zacosmia target a single host (Anthophora), and also Holcopasites targets Pseudopangurgus, Neopasites targets Dufourea, Oreopasites targets Calliopsis, Sphecodes targets Halictus, Townsendiella targets Conanthalictus, and Triepeolus targets Melissodes as well as a number of non-bee parasites and predators that target Anthophora busleyi (22 in California; I said that right: 22 nonbee species target A. busleyi! 18 of those bee species were known to kill bee larvae in similarity to the U.S. and Canada residential boarding schools and similar to colonial history). That’s just California biodiversity for you but it poses a great and epic implication that there could be an original slaver species that adapted alongside the many enslaved native and indigenous populations of organisms and that can also explain in essence why so many species mimic or independently evolve new ways to interact with the world and to make it their own. (Source “Field guide to the common bees of California: including bees of the western united states).
This can actually be a major part of a huge framework in the field of evolution because it may actually explain that cetaceans could have been an enslaved species and that they retreated into the oceans and developed not only a sense of freedom but out of the constraints of their slaver-overlords developed sonar. Either that or they already had sonar (which may have been a larger part of their hypothetical enslavement because of how useful that could be in use in water and thereby they may have originated as a sort of species that fishes out food from freshwater and had the capacity to go into a large body of water and take a source of food for a more superior being standing guard in the body of water.
A few good questions to ask about this primitive potential slave is: When this hypothetical slave-trajectory originated was it in the primordial goo of the oceans? Which came first? Did so many animals evolve to retreat into the ocean and into water to escape a brutality created by so many other less emotionally intelligent and more driven species? Is this seen today in human beings? In the fossil fuel industry? In the Sackler, Kock, and Walton families? In Nazi Germany, war torn Middle East, Palestine, U.S. and Canadian reservations, and domestically violent, emotionally abusive, and frankly insidiously manipulative households?
Does this pose the same for the consistent backpedal of progress? Isn’t it parallel? We roll back rights everyday allowing people to take one step forward with autonomy only to take two steps back.
[note: I'm trying to trace all of the robber and slaver ants, parasitic birds, and parasitic bees and similar species that have this origin behavior of exploiting. My theory I've been thinking about is this: that there's a single "slaver species" and while it's hard to wrap your mind around i think this correlation as a marker for forensic thinking to look at clues. I'm trying to look at whether or not this traces back to a single species that branched off and separated and then diversified and evolved or if one species did perform what we might call or consider "Slavery" but then we consider whether there's other species that are just mimicking that older and more ancient behavior or if it independently evolved on its own throughout time? An important implication for humanity This implication is potentially a source of information on how to diverge from it without just "feeling" like it or summing it up as "good and bad"; and I specifically believe that this behavior will lead to human extinction if we do not diverge from this highly outdated form of structure in ecology and human nature I believe that something like one really bad war could wipe it all out or one miscalculation could lead us to project a fight or die response which probably would normally save life in a survival situation.. but you can see how generative AI and nukes complicate that innate evolution and adaptation in a highly intelligent species (humans are believed to be the most intelligent and I have a lot of theories on why and why not and how some people are and aren't; largely stemming from social structures and emotion; I have a strong sense that maternal love is a huge part of it and community support; as opposed to competition or die)]
[I especially want to look at the parasitic bee's of the western united states and the correlation between U.S. colonialism with regard to what happened to the indigenous people and how they'd been pushed west and I want to look at ecology in the western united states and the eastern half and compare and contrast that and look to U.S. indigenous/colonial history and see if there are parallels. this can be a highly contested area of debate because it's nearly impossible to source these species ancestors and whether or not they followed colonial humans or whether or not they were invasive or whether or not they were naturally evolving along side their target species that they rely on. it's also controversial especially because it's similar to the era of eugenics. I think that is actually a whole part of scientific history that is related as a single yet potentially repeatable event. I genuinely believe that there's this concept of "Good" in people and I also genuinely believe the concept of "Evil"; at least conceptually]
[Overview] [note: each thing can eventually be expanded down into a volume of detail but only through research]
1) Introduction
[note: a general introduction to the concepts of a single species that exploit, domesticate, and enslave "indigenous" or "native" populations; and that branched off and diversified and possibly went extinct only for that adaptation or evolution to independently evolve as a reactive mimicry from other species. The introduction implies that there is a common ancestor dating back to this behavior in nature, the world, human nature, our "relatives" on the tree of life, etcetera- but specifically looking at this particular connection to other genus and species; such as Hymenoptera, primates, birds, and many other species. The scope of a project like this is massive and especially with the risk of extinction at hand with unsustainability and its cultural and sociological structures; it's harder to compile that information completely and to understand and trace back our Earth's often brutal history. I hope to at least in this thread to reference a wealth of information to look into; seeing as a large community encompasses this forum; seeing it as a "commons" to everyone and not one person's since it serves to support the drive to research]
2) Chapter one: Enslavement and exploit in bees
3) Chapter two: Enslavement and exploit in ants
4) Chapter three: Enslavement and exploit in humanity
5) Theories on Cetaceans
6) Chapter four: The pharmaceutical industry as exploit and enslavement
7) Chapter five: The fossil fuel industry as the road
8) Family tree of bee's, ant's, humans with maps, figures, and graphs dating back to common ancestors and where they lived. [note: I understand that on some of this there's like no information for it but I know that looking at the fossil record these prehistoric Hymenoptera are larger so what specific ancestor are these kidnapper, robber, and slaver ants dating back to to figure out how it evolved?]
9) essay(s)
10) contributing essay(s)
[note:] more to come, I'm trying to make this essential to forensic anthropology and also to forensic architecture in relation to both fields being multi-disciplinary. I plan to specifically have essays on the pharmaceutical and the fossil fuel industry and see if any of it relates to nature as a behavior but also I'd like to examine working conditions of laborers to see if this behavior has just become more mild and takes a form in waste, work place discrimination, and things like that as though we're bouncing from biology through forensics and into sociology and psychology where we rebound into reflection.
11) the war, riot, protest, and emigrate response
[note: will keep expanding chapters. The author does have ADHD and ASD and works full time]
A counter cartography of the modern world
introduction.
ExxonMobile knew about the risks of climate change before we did. Bill Gates had access to code before anyone else. Whites in the United States had a significant advantage over non-whites because of slavery, forced removal of the indigenous, and because of the privilege of accessing, using, enforcing, and encompassing better standards of life than our counter-part human beings. I’d like to go back to Exxon Mobile and their knowledge for a moment and then we can split into a larger concept to play with.
ExxonMobile knew about climate change. They also were the one’s mining oil. Fossil fuels had direct links to wealthy families who’d made their money off Valium and Percocet, coal, clothes, land, minerals, exploitation in labor, and more. The fossil fuel had brought all these things about to the world. They carried the Valium and Percocet to our pill bottles and made the very container made out of petroleum formed into plastic. They didn’t just know about climate change; they knew about geology, climate, physics, psychology, sociology, and all other forms of multi-disciplinary ways to coerce out the world as they saw it for themselves and how they wanted it to be despite how that world affects others.
ExxonMobile likely found fossils. That very discovery tells us that the planet isn’t what we think of. It also shows to an impulsive individual how we “must” be the one to decide it all since we are here and they are there and ExxonMobile likely had to know that this oil was an organism. From there: who discovered the meteor smashing into the planet before we did? Then, from that discovery of what killed so many organisms and transformed them into a fuel containing and trapping their carbon as a compressed and transformed material inanimate? That may have also meant that this large meteor that destroyed the age of Jurassic wasn’t the only point in time for the energy web to form into a source and not through an ecology.
[Note: Theory: If ExxonMobile had more knowledge and intelligence before everyone else did about multidisciplinary approaches, before it was discovered by scientists; that may have given them a practical advantage to set the stage for themselves. It allowed them to remove information they didn’t like until they had the advantage of knowledge. That allowed them to sustain their competitive, and practical, and also literal advantage.
ExxonMobile didn’t just know about climate change and what would happen if we continued to burn them for transportation, energy production, and luxury; but they also knew about more. You had to have knowledge on a brilliant variety of concepts before being able to establish and install the function that fossil fuels serves society.
Now we’ve got a mountain of trash and it’s not a resource. The trash is placed in poor countries as a dump where actual people live. Now the trash is floating in the ocean in gyros; like 8 of them or so…
They know about humanity, and they know about the Earth, and they have discovered fossils only to study and destroy them, they researched better than any other scientist and transformed the massive profits into shell companies to produce this research in dark because if people learned of an intentional enslavement through the established and manufactured dependence of their source of advantage; then people could respond not react. It almost sounds like I think that they are the descendants of a group of primates whose purpose is to enslave other primates and to not perform their own work by using a system of logic specific to slaver-primates… ]
[Note: Theory: taking similar logic but applying that to the competitive advantage the for profit pharmaceutical industry wouldn't that also mean that many of these corporations are also putting their research into taking advantage of markets and finding the proper location to set up their operation (maybe even a lot like a weird trap or functioning like a trap)]
[Note: these are just implications and theories on relating it back to humanity and we also use the term "slaver" as a larger behavior that humanity took part in and still do so today both literal/criminally and conceptually] [note: yes, today in the modern world slavery exists. There's people being enslaved. There was an illegal cannabis grow operation that used slave labor for production that i remember hearing about, it happened in the UK and there was a wealthy couple that had enslaved a boy, an African immigrant and he was somewhat recently released and freed at 60-something and the couple that did that got into trouble for it but the man was like 60 or 61 years old once he was freed- i'm going to look up those two things and re-edit the post later. This is also not mentioning human trafficking in modern slavery. We also aren't totally drawing lines to emigrating out of the country and slavery we think of things like the roads that African and (parallel) South American migrants take and die on. We want to contrast the times when people do become disappeared or whose bodies are discovered with enslavement and we want to contrast "the road" with "the slave" and "the slave driver" whenever we think about this forensically]
There’s a lot of other animals that have independently evolved this trait and seem to be fully separate species that independently evolved like that of the Slaver-ants, parasitic birds, parasites in general, and indeed parasitic bees like the Parasitic genus(s): Coelioxys, Dioxys, Epeoloides, Epeolus, Ericrocis, Holcopasites, Melecta, Neopasites, Nomada, Oreopasites, Sphecodes, Stelis, Townsendiella, Triepeolus, Xeromelecta, and Zacosmia. Some of these have a single host where as a few have been more colonial and target more than one up to three for Dioxys (Anthidium, Megachile, and Osmia), two for Nomada (Andrena and Nomia), and same for Stelis (Heriades and Hoplitis). Coelioxys also targets Megachile too. Epeoloides targets Macropis, Epeolus targets Colletes, Ericrosis, Melecta, Xeromelecta, and Zacosmia target a single host (Anthophora), and also Holcopasites targets Pseudopangurgus, Neopasites targets Dufourea, Oreopasites targets Calliopsis, Sphecodes targets Halictus, Townsendiella targets Conanthalictus, and Triepeolus targets Melissodes as well as a number of non-bee parasites and predators that target Anthophora busleyi (22 in California; I said that right: 22 nonbee species target A. busleyi! 18 of those bee species were known to kill bee larvae in similarity to the U.S. and Canada residential boarding schools and similar to colonial history). That’s just California biodiversity for you but it poses a great and epic implication that there could be an original slaver species that adapted alongside the many enslaved native and indigenous populations of organisms and that can also explain in essence why so many species mimic or independently evolve new ways to interact with the world and to make it their own. (Source “Field guide to the common bees of California: including bees of the western united states).
This can actually be a major part of a huge framework in the field of evolution because it may actually explain that cetaceans could have been an enslaved species and that they retreated into the oceans and developed not only a sense of freedom but out of the constraints of their slaver-overlords developed sonar. Either that or they already had sonar (which may have been a larger part of their hypothetical enslavement because of how useful that could be in use in water and thereby they may have originated as a sort of species that fishes out food from freshwater and had the capacity to go into a large body of water and take a source of food for a more superior being standing guard in the body of water.
A few good questions to ask about this primitive potential slave is: When this hypothetical slave-trajectory originated was it in the primordial goo of the oceans? Which came first? Did so many animals evolve to retreat into the ocean and into water to escape a brutality created by so many other less emotionally intelligent and more driven species? Is this seen today in human beings? In the fossil fuel industry? In the Sackler, Kock, and Walton families? In Nazi Germany, war torn Middle East, Palestine, U.S. and Canadian reservations, and domestically violent, emotionally abusive, and frankly insidiously manipulative households?
Does this pose the same for the consistent backpedal of progress? Isn’t it parallel? We roll back rights everyday allowing people to take one step forward with autonomy only to take two steps back.
Last edited:
. 
