The Jesters are ironically less foolish than people with moral absolutes. I suppose that's why the jokes on you, when they're there.
The primary source of relative morality is actually rooted in revenge. You go for what you want, and you stay away from things you don't like. Typically you don't do things to beings that can do the same things to you, out of revenge. And you'd do well to punch back to entrain aggressors. Even wasps with no real chance of winning do well on the pain of revenge alone.
(The following are only my claims of experiences, take them with a grain of salt as I would yours.)
This is even more true in every spiritual situation I have seen. There appears to be no difference. No one's morality or mantra has ever stopped me in astral projection, (Lucid dreams) or DMT trips, or spells. The people that can hurt / trap me, force me weigh the situation, and make a cost benefit analysis to the engagement. But if they are weighed down by morals or beliefs in gods and stuff they are easy to either beat into submission or trick into submission.
These entities will engage in the more sophisticated negotiations when they can't easily trick or beat you. Usually, they trick you or use pleasures, it's easiest because everyone is so... deluded. They'll just do whatever these things want because they can't sense much or have no context, no understanding, or really limiting beliefs and poor imaginations. People really be out there doing what "Jesus" in a dream told them to do. (This was my friend, who also only saw the top half of this Jesus figure and literally changed his profession over its advice
)
The minute you see a "righteous, holy, divine, transcendent Buddha" turn off the sham and go about its business will screw with your mind.
Evil is not a very useful category for creating a context of reality. I suggest not using it. There is some terrifying "energy" out there, it definitely feels "evil' in the strict sadistic and/or terrifying sense. But it has its uses against you, and if you aren't willing to use it, that's one less tool for you and one less thing to worry about for them.
I leave you with a fictional quote from a star wars book that is only partially relevant, but I like to leave them.
“Evil? ... What is that? ... Are you evil, then, or are you simply stronger and more awake than others? Who gives more shape to sentient history: the good, who adhere to the tried and true, or those who seek to rouse beings from their stupor and lead them to glory?"
-James Luceno, some book writer.
EDIT: Also being one with everything has not gained me anything, leaves me in the same situation I started in, and the experience generally feels like a total waste of time. I also assert that other people "being one with everything" has also not gained them much other than a perspective change that maybe was therapeutic for them. When I see this, though I typically get an impression that it only served to put on ever rosier goggles so they can go on being okay with being poor, thinking along the lines of eating rocks instead of cake is "just fine as long as I don't taste cake." When you end up back in this experience, if you don't feel like you're living in a poorly drawn cartoon, idk what to say.
EDIT2: When I have that experience I would call "one with everything" I don't seem to be able to recognize anything as good or evil at all, to better answer that question. So, no, then. I also don't feel one with good. Or anything that could be specified. In fact all I can say is that it "felt like I was one with everything" part of why I think it's not very helpful and mostly a tool used to dazzle or occupy people. Just a feeling like every other feeling.
