Cactus ID . . . anyone?

[Magicman]

Hi forum

The discovery that peyote is legal in my part of the world has lead me to have a deeper interest in cacti ,now that its more feasible.


And I found these in my garden,I'd never taken notive till now
sorry for the bad pic, if you cant ID off this , i'll try get a better one.

I don't really have any reason to believe they're psycho active , I'm just hoping like hell

my suspicion is either San Pedro , or Trichocereus macrogonus , but thats more a guess then anything.

Thanks

 

[ouro]

I can't be certain, but it looks like plain cereus to me. It might make some nice fruits for you (a type of pitaya).

 

[Magicman]

Well in thirteen years neither of the clumps of this cactus that i have ,have had a flower or a fruit. If that helps
It may be older than that but I've only been around it for that long

 

[Infundibulum]

It is really not a trichocereus. Most likely a cereus as ouro already said.

I have stumbled upon these beasts quite a few times and they look as nicely grown trichocerei from the distance but alas, it's not the real thing when you get closer. Like a mirage in the desert.

 

[Magicman]

Ahhhh, oh well, doubted they'd be worthwhile . . . but if they were ( i wanted them to be so badly) , I'd have a combined like , hundred meters of psycho active cacti , oh well. the search continues . . .

 

[Magicman]

You guys said its not, but just in case ,heres another pic