• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Consider only accessing this kind of community from the "darkweb"

Migrated topic.
CatholicPsychonaut said:
benzyme said:
because I use HTTPS everywhere.
and, I'm not doing anything illegal.

Isn't there implied illegal acts just by being on here?.. I mean, seriously. The name of the forum contains a schedule I substance.

which is also a known detectable metabolite of endogenous tryptamine.
you're a criminal just for being alive.

"Shh, dude ... don't talk about DMT. You could be arrested."
 
benzyme said:
CatholicPsychonaut said:
benzyme said:
because I use HTTPS everywhere.
and, I'm not doing anything illegal.

Isn't there implied illegal acts just by being on here?.. I mean, seriously. The name of the forum contains a schedule I substance.

which is also a known detectable metabolite of endogenous tryptamine.
you're a criminal just for being alive.

"Shh, dude ... don't talk about DMT. You could be arrested."

I understand that. I also agree that the law is a fucking retard. That doesn't mean it isn't a law.
 
Ok, so alpha, explain to me what is preferable to being on tor in terms of anonymity? If there's something better that is as user friendly, I'd like to know, as I am FAR from a computer expert, but would like to have some privacy on the web.
 
CatholicPsychonaut said:
Ok, so alpha, explain to me what is preferable to being on tor in terms of anonymity? If there's something better that is as user friendly, I'd like to know, as I am FAR from a computer expert, but would like to have some privacy on the web.
User-friendly / anonymity is an oxymoron.
 
a1pha said:
CatholicPsychonaut said:
Ok, so alpha, explain to me what is preferable to being on tor in terms of anonymity? If there's something better that is as user friendly, I'd like to know, as I am FAR from a computer expert, but would like to have some privacy on the web.
User-friendly / anonymity is an oxymoron.

OK. so the opinion is that you are the expert. Tell me how to be annon. If I have to learn something new, I'm fine with that. I like learning new things. Don't just make fun of me. Point me in the right direction if I'm deluded about this stuff.
 
I'm with Benz on this. I think it's silly to use ttyose because were monitored in so many different ways already what is using a tor thing gonna help any against that. And like dreamer said I'm pretty sure the gov. Doesn't like anyone slightly affiliated with a anon program alot more then someone who frequents an online forum.
 
I think the point being made is that you don't need tor for the nexus as it isn't illegal to visit here. If you are doing illegal stuff on the net by all means use tor but be aware that tor is being watched.
 
CatholicPsychonaut said:
OK. so the opinion is that you are the expert.
My apologies, but the opinion is wrong. I'm no expert.

Every person needs to evaluate their own needs and make their own conclusions on these matters.
 
a1pha said:
CatholicPsychonaut said:
That doesn't mean it isn't a law.
It's all about precedent... and so far, it's in our favor. See Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal.

I'm well aware of the arguements made under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. I'm also aware that these are considered by law VERY narrow, specific rulings. The Uniato do Vegetal ruling didn't even protect the Santo Diame church in the USA till they fought for their rights to use their plants as well. Even now, their ruling only allows them to drink legally within the state of Oregon (Diame, I mean). Also, the ruling you're mentioning is specifically related to RELIGIOUS use. Every group that has successfully argued for the use of an entheogen under this law has had a religious form at least mildly similar to mainstream judeo-christianity. It would be extremely difficult for one to claim right to use freebase DMT alone in one's attic under this law. You basically have to "prove" that you are a real religion.

I'm not saying that DMT is some kind of hot potato right now, but I think it is definitely on the rise in terms of notoriety thanks to that duchebag Rogan.

I'm just saying that if you have DMT in your house right now, or if you have Aya and aren't in one of two very specific religious groups in very specific geographical regions, then you ARE breaking the law, even if that law is stupid and isn't a law that is currently being acted upon harshly. I think we need to be more aware of the laws that are selectively enforced than those that are uniformly enforced. MJ is an A1 example. For all intents and purposes, MJ is very close to legal in the USA if you are white, middle to upper class, and middle aged. However, if you're young, black, and poor, your ass is going to jail for a blunt.
 
benzyme said:
because I use HTTPS everywhere.
and, I'm not doing anything illegal.
With HTTPS your ISP can still see which sites you visited, just not what parts of the sites and any posts you read or made.

And visiting the DMT-Nexus in itself is not illegal, though I can imagine that it can be used as circumstantial evidence.


And shall we keep this thread friendly for all please? Internet security cannot be talked enough about, our privacy and security is precious.


Kind regards,

The Traveler
 
Back
Top Bottom