seasonsintheabyss
Rising Star
edit: in the clear
Tattvamasi said:Recently purchased klean strip vm&p from a local big chain home/hardware store.
Evap tested it and not a trace of anything on the dish, no residue no nothing, same for me as all the past times i've used it.
So idk. 8)
TimePantry said:I found this page, which seems to suggest that solvent formulations have been changed to conform with EPA regulations.
http://www.eastman.com/Literature_Center/M/M310.pdf
concombres said:TimePantry said:I found this page, which seems to suggest that solvent formulations have been changed to conform with EPA regulations.
http://www.eastman.com/Literature_Center/M/M310.pdf
The reading is a little bit over my head there but from what I gather it looks like technical grade hydrocarbon solvents are becoming more & more subject to very vague MSDS with little to no mention of the actual formulation of the solvent blend.
What makes things even worse, these brands seem to rarely update their seemingly useless MSDS & even when they do one store may have some produced years ago & another may have a batch produced last week.
The more I learn about the regulations, production, & labelling of technical grade solvents, the more shady & unsafe they begin to look.
It would be nice if they would list a batch number & the exact composition of the batch on the cans. Something more along the lines of a boiling fraction or listing exactly which light aliphatic hydrocarbons & other volatile or non votalile compounds are present, but then it does not matter to these companies because the solvents are not made to be used to produce anything being consumed by humans. :thumb_dow
1ce said:concombres said:TimePantry said:I found this page, which seems to suggest that solvent formulations have been changed to conform with EPA regulations.
http://www.eastman.com/Literature_Center/M/M310.pdf
The reading is a little bit over my head there but from what I gather it looks like technical grade hydrocarbon solvents are becoming more & more subject to very vague MSDS with little to no mention of the actual formulation of the solvent blend.
What makes things even worse, these brands seem to rarely update their seemingly useless MSDS & even when they do one store may have some produced years ago & another may have a batch produced last week.
The more I learn about the regulations, production, & labelling of technical grade solvents, the more shady & unsafe they begin to look.
It would be nice if they would list a batch number & the exact composition of the batch on the cans. Something more along the lines of a boiling fraction or listing exactly which light aliphatic hydrocarbons & other volatile or non votalile compounds are present, but then it does not matter to these companies because the solvents are not made to be used to produce anything being consumed by humans. :thumb_dow
And thats the thing. You get what ypu pay for intelectually, and financially. Naptha works for a low cost minimal amount of effort.
But many other solvents can be made/extraxted that are far superior to our use. The loss of naptha doesn't herald the end of the world, it just indicates that more effort may or may not be required in thefuture.
To be fair, there's not much that can be said about naptha other than the fact it is conveneint. But it also taked large quantities to use, thus wasteful. It is a detection/flammability hazard due to the large quantities evaporated. I'm sure naptha amd lighter fluid will always be around for us to use, but there are definitely dlternatives if it seems shady in any way.
ducdevil said:1ce said:concombres said:TimePantry said:I found this page, which seems to suggest that solvent formulations have been changed to conform with EPA regulations.
http://www.eastman.com/Literature_Center/M/M310.pdf
The reading is a little bit over my head there but from what I gather it looks like technical grade hydrocarbon solvents are becoming more & more subject to very vague MSDS with little to no mention of the actual formulation of the solvent blend.
What makes things even worse, these brands seem to rarely update their seemingly useless MSDS & even when they do one store may have some produced years ago & another may have a batch produced last week.
The more I learn about the regulations, production, & labelling of technical grade solvents, the more shady & unsafe they begin to look.
It would be nice if they would list a batch number & the exact composition of the batch on the cans. Something more along the lines of a boiling fraction or listing exactly which light aliphatic hydrocarbons & other volatile or non votalile compounds are present, but then it does not matter to these companies because the solvents are not made to be used to produce anything being consumed by humans. :thumb_dow
And thats the thing. You get what ypu pay for intelectually, and financially. Naptha works for a low cost minimal amount of effort.
But many other solvents can be made/extraxted that are far superior to our use. The loss of naptha doesn't herald the end of the world, it just indicates that more effort may or may not be required in thefuture.
To be fair, there's not much that can be said about naptha other than the fact it is conveneint. But it also taked large quantities to use, thus wasteful. It is a detection/flammability hazard due to the large quantities evaporated. I'm sure naptha amd lighter fluid will always be around for us to use, but there are definitely dlternatives if it seems shady in any way.
so, in regards to your quote, in a perfect world with no limitations of availability or cost, what would be your "dream" solvent?
1ce said:concombres said:TimePantry said:I found this page, which seems to suggest that solvent formulations have been changed to conform with EPA regulations.
http://www.eastman.com/Literature_Center/M/M310.pdf
The reading is a little bit over my head there but from what I gather it looks like technical grade hydrocarbon solvents are becoming more & more subject to very vague MSDS with little to no mention of the actual formulation of the solvent blend.
What makes things even worse, these brands seem to rarely update their seemingly useless MSDS & even when they do one store may have some produced years ago & another may have a batch produced last week.
The more I learn about the regulations, production, & labelling of technical grade solvents, the more shady & unsafe they begin to look.
It would be nice if they would list a batch number & the exact composition of the batch on the cans. Something more along the lines of a boiling fraction or listing exactly which light aliphatic hydrocarbons & other volatile or non votalile compounds are present, but then it does not matter to these companies because the solvents are not made to be used to produce anything being consumed by humans. :thumb_dow
And thats the thing. You get what ypu pay for intelectually, and financially. Naptha works for a low cost minimal amount of effort.
But many other solvents can be made/extraxted that are far superior to our use. The loss of naptha doesn't herald the end of the world, it just indicates that more effort may or may not be required in thefuture.
To be fair, there's not much that can be said about naptha other than the fact it is conveneint. But it also taked large quantities to use, thus wasteful. It is a detection/flammability hazard due to the large quantities evaporated. I'm sure naptha amd lighter fluid will always be around for us to use, but there are definitely dlternatives if it seems shady in any way.