RhythmSpring
Established member
This might seem random, but does anybody here take diatomaceous earth AND drink Ayahuasca / pharmahuasca? I'd like to talk with you.
That seems silly - you need plenty of ions to function normally. If you think you're getting too many, why not just eat less salt (or whatever it is that's too high in ionic compounds...).jamie said:bonds to form ionic compounds and flush them from the body, apparently. Yeah, I have eaten enough of the stuff. I dunno if it really does anything.
RhythmSpring said:Do some research.
This is just to pique your curiosity: Amazon Reviews
I recently took some and it DRASTICALLY changed the way my body was functioning... mostly for the better. But something tells me to be cautious with it. It started rebuilding my joints (I have damaged joints) like nobody's business. I got a strong craving for gelatin and raw veggies, ate that, and drank lots and lots and lots of water, increased intestinal motility (was pooping more), was able to hydrate much better, I could go on. My bones felt funny...
This is NOT to be underestimated. For some people it may make a huge difference.
How do you know it's not a placebo effect? I don't know how you administer the DE, but would it be possible to randomize it in such a way that some days (or weeks) you're taking that, and in others, you're taking just raw flour or something?RhythmSpring said:Do some research.
This is just to pique your curiosity: Amazon Reviews
I recently took some and it DRASTICALLY changed the way my body was functioning... mostly for the better. But something tells me to be cautious with it. It started rebuilding my joints (I have damaged joints) like nobody's business. I got a strong craving for gelatin and raw veggies, ate that, and drank lots and lots and lots of water, increased intestinal motility (was pooping more), was able to hydrate much better, I could go on. My bones felt funny...
This is NOT to be underestimated. For some people it may make a huge difference.
Then don't bring it up.RhythmSpring said:But, more importantly, this thread is NOT a thread discussing the validity or efficacy of diatomaceous earth. I didn't bring this up to argue with anyone about if it works or not. It works for me.
RhythmSpring said:Your standards are different than mine. You look for standardized, double-blind placebo-controlled studies, I look at the hundreds if not thousands of individual personal accounts, and assume that they're not all lying or experiencing placebo when they report remission of extreme conditions. It baffles me that some people discount the mountain of anecdotal evidence.
But, more importantly, this thread is NOT a thread discussing the validity or efficacy of diatomaceous earth. I didn't bring this up to argue with anyone about if it works or not. It works for me.
I made this thread so that I could find other people who take it and speak with them. Thank you.
That's not entirely fair - each of these three studies is making use of anecdotal evidence, primarily. In each case, it's a self-reported measure by the interviewee. They were all hailed as great news, both her on the Nexus and in the broader psychedelic science community.Psybin said:Anecdotal evidence isn't supportive of anything. If you don't want to be branded a charlatan, don't sell snake oil. The point of the Nexus isn't to fulfill your confirmation bias.
Nathanial.Dread said:That's not entirely fair - each of these three studies is making use of anecdotal evidence, primarily. In each case, it's a self-reported measure by the interviewee. They were all hailed as great news, both her on the Nexus and in the broader psychedelic science community.Psybin said:Anecdotal evidence isn't supportive of anything. If you don't want to be branded a charlatan, don't sell snake oil. The point of the Nexus isn't to fulfill your confirmation bias.
The limiting factor with anecdotal evidence is the lack of control: you only ever get correlational data, since there is no control group for an individual. If you have enough anecdotal evidence, and your statistical methods are sufficiently robust, you can at least get a general picture of what trends to look for when beginning controlled studies. Each of those linked to studies where the number of respondents ranged from 600 (at the low end) all the way up to almost 200,000.
Unfortunately, this kind of data is best for validating the null hypothesis. If you say "psychedelics cause mental illness," sufficient anecdotal evidence can be grounds to reject the null. It's harder to go the other way ("DE improves health/gut function/whatever" ) since you can never be sure that it was the DE that did it, and not the placebo effect.
There is a time and place to listen to people's personal accounts, you just have to think critically about them.
Blessings
~ND
inaniel said:I've used it on and off for a while. Can definitely notice a difference when I do. Notice improved skin and digestive health. I'm in really good shape physically too. Does this help with that? I don't know, just wanted to brag. I've recommended it to a few people whose enjoyed it as well.
inaniel said:I've used it on and off for a while. Can definitely notice a difference when I do. Notice improved skin and digestive health. I'm in really good shape physically too. Does this help with that? I don't know, just wanted to brag. I've recommended it to a few people whose enjoyed it as well.
Definitely glad I didn't wait around for studies to prove something will help my health when I experienced a decline physically. The side effects to some commonly accepted meds or drugs is incredible. I was once given a folder of waivers for some acne medication which caused high incidences of depression and suicide. The doctor said this was normal. What kind of world...