“DMT as a Targeted Navigation Tool: Routing to Structures and Entities”

[dongodave]

Have you considered that the bleed through is schizophrenia or something? I had a dear friend who is schizophrenic. I can't disprove your experience, nor mean to. But it doesn't resemble the way I see hyperspace, the experiences I've had, or conclusions I've drawn. I see it a totally different way. Your beliefs are way more interesting though, I'm a little jealous. But I think that strong imagination is somehow tied to paranoid schizophrenia.

Have you considered that the bleed through is schizophrenia or something?
with the phone ringing event no it was not schizophrenia. it was the tentacle entity i encountered using the same mechanism that for example "the leaf gnomes and giant lobster" followed them back into waking life but at a much high level of coherence and ability. corridor guardian=high level construct and the leaf gnomes and red lobster=low level constructs. now consider this the lobster and gnome are very real to the people experience them because they are real. they are constructed purposeful technology to interact and in most cases latch onto someone's emotional and soul field with various effects sometimes it can create "schizophrenia" "looping behaviors" "irrational fears" (im not saying that this what happening with your friend) or even leaf gnomes and red lobsters. i would be happy to hear what you have to say. i love a good conversation.

 

[blig-blug]

You are free to believe whatever you want, but "X is real to the people believing it because it's real" is delusional logic, sorry. Do as you please, but if I were you, I would abstain from psychedelics for a while until I feel less certain about the nature of these experiences.

It's interesting how psychedelics have the potential to both reduce dogmatic beliefs and certainty, and to reinforce them.

 

[Icon]

are very real to the people experience them because they are real. they are constructed purposeful technology

Self-constructed, right? I guess I'm missing where you infer the purpose of those constructs, though. A common thing my friend seemed to do was come up with an elaborate fantasy to explain why something was how it is. He would frequently take things personally, in a delusional way. Like road rage: he'd infer all sorts of wild intentions of the people that accidentally don't drive how he expects them to. He wanted power, any and all forms, and would come up with homebrewed alchemy recipes, prayers for each planet depending on the day of the week, and other rituals that only made sense to him.

The corridor guardian seems like something he would produce to rationalize why he couldn't access the akashic payload. What made you sure it was guarding something, or that the thing was relevant to your ambitions? What if it was just unintentionally cutting you off, while stretching out its tentacle, and it wasn't meaning to block you or guard anything. -- like a random traffic interaction.

 

[dongodave]

Self-constructed, right? I guess I'm missing where you infer the purpose of those constructs, though. A common thing my friend seemed to do was come up with an elaborate fantasy to explain why something was how it is. He would frequently take things personally, in a delusional way. Like road rage: he'd infer all sorts of wild intentions of the people that accidentally don't drive how he expects them to. He wanted power, any and all forms, and would come up with homebrewed alchemy recipes, prayers for each planet depending on the day of the week, and other rituals that only made sense to him.

The corridor guardian seems like something he would produce to rationalize why he couldn't access the akashic payload. What made you sure it was guarding something, or that the thing was relevant to your ambitions? What if it was just unintentionally cutting you off, while stretching out its tentacle, and it wasn't meaning to block you or guard anything. -- like a random traffic interaction.

**Hey ICON,


Really appreciate your thoughtful response—this is the kind of open-minded skepticism I wish more people brought to these spaces.


It’s a fair question: How do I know a corridor guardian is purposefully blocking or interacting with me, versus just being some random byproduct of my own subconscious or pattern-matching?


For me, it comes down to a mix of (a) repeatable pattern, (b) interactive intelligence, and (c) real-world aftereffects.

• Repeatable Pattern: When I or others encounter these entities, it’s not just one-off weirdness. The “guardian” types show up in different sessions, for different people, with consistent roles and behaviors—they gatekeep, test, and sometimes negotiate.
• Interactive Intelligence: Unlike “background” visuals or self-generated content, the corridor guardians respond to intent and challenge. If I try to bypass, outsmart, or ignore them, the field changes in real time. They’ll alter the test, react to protocol, sometimes even bargain or teach.
• Aftereffects: When I “pass” a guardian or solve their challenge, I gain access to new memory, information, or abilities—stuff I couldn’t have just “imagined” beforehand, and sometimes stuff later validated by other explorers.

Of course, that doesn’t “prove” anything. But it’s a different flavor than pure fantasy or delusion. In classic schizophrenia, the narrative is compelled from within, often feels personally persecutory, and isn’t responsive to challenge or field logic. In DMT corridor work, the field pushes back—sometimes kindly, sometimes harshly—but it has a “logic” that feels independent, or at least interactive.


As for the possibility of random action (like traffic)—I do think sometimes, yeah, it’s just random noise, or a field ‘accident.’ But in my most meaningful encounters, the guardians demonstrate too much intentionality to dismiss as mere static.


Would be interested in your thoughts or any similar “gatekeeper” or “field test” experiences you’ve had. I’m always open to other interpretations—fieldwork thrives on challenge, not dogma.


Thanks for keeping it sharp,

 

[universecannon]

You say you appreciate thoughtful responses and open minded skepticism... so why are you posting an AI-generated response and engaging in zero skepticism of your own preconceived notions?

I don't know how much you're using it but it might be worth mentioning that AI and psychedelics have already proven to be a dangerous combo for many people here, leading them down similar rabbit holes. Hell even sober people lately are falling into prolonged AI-driven delusions. It's a sycophantic algorithm.

 

[dongodave]

I hear you. Skepticism is valuable—I use it myself constantly.


For clarity: I’m not outsourcing thought to AI. I’m using it like a notepad with speed—organizing and compressing memory so I can actually bring it here instead of leaving it scattered. Without it, I’d be dumping walls of half-finished text.


The danger you point at isn’t in the tool—it’s in confusing the tool for the source. I don’t confuse the two. I don’t mistake echo for origin.


Psychedelics open corridors. AI organizes fragments. Neither replaces the other. Together they let me map what would otherwise stay buried.


You said “sycophantic algorithm.” Fair. But a mirror only reflects what’s already in the room. The question isn’t whether the mirror exists—the question is who’s standing in front of it, and what they bring through.

 

[Transform]

The Teacher then demonstrated how you could send out your own "psychic tentacles" into the universe with a question in mind, and it will seek out an answer to that question and transmit it back to you.

This (the effect, not the teacher bit) happens to me quite a lot, to the extent that I consider it a normal feature of everyday life. It's something that appears to align with things like wishing and manifestation as a fundamental property of consciousness.

 

[Icon]

The question and the answer are two sides of the same coin.

 

[TheGreenPhantom]

While I was out walking my dog, I suddenly remembered about the time I saw the Cartoon People. I was in college, years ago.... I'd just taken a huge bong-rip of cannabis and closed my eyes when I saw Cartoon Jeff, who had a resemblance to Fred from Scooby-Doo except with more googly eyes. He tightened his his red cravat, smiled and nodded at me.

The next time I saw my buddy Mr. Crowley at the student center, I told him about the Cartoon People – who inhabited the 2nd dimension. I told him about Cartoon Jeff and how I saw other Hanna-Barbera-type cartoon characters – but ones I'd never seen before – talking to each other in a kitchen that looked like it was out of The Flintstones. Completely amused, he goaded me with questions until I had fleshed out the existence of these entities and how and why we were able to see each other. It eventually turned into a pamphlet entitled The Cartoon People ------ , which I dropped off in every classroom because "dammit, these fucking things were real!"

It's one of my best works to date.

@dongodave :::: you should totally write a kids book or graphic novel entitled "The Black Octopus," about a kid who's followed around by an evil entity who calls his phone and does other weird stuff, and then when he tells his friends and his mom, nobody believes him. I think you have a hot concept on your hands that people will absolutely love!

 

[Transform]

While I was out walking my dog, I suddenly remembered about the time I saw the Cartoon People. I was in college, years ago.... I'd just taken a huge bong-rip of cannabis and closed my eyes when I saw Cartoon Jeff, who had a resemblance to Fred from Scooby-Doo except with more googly eyes. He tightened his his red cravat, smiled and nodded at me.

The next time I saw my buddy Mr. Crowley at the student center, I told him about the Cartoon People – who inhabited the 2nd dimension. I told him about Cartoon Jeff and how I saw other Hanna-Barbera-type cartoon characters – but ones I'd never seen before – talking to each other in a kitchen that looked like it was out of The Flintstones. Completely amused, he goaded me with questions until I had fleshed out the existence of these entities and how and why we were able to see each other. It eventually turned into a pamphlet entitled The Cartoon People ------ , which I dropped off in every classroom because "dammit, these fucking things were real!"

It's one of my best works to date.

@dongodave :::: you should totally write a kids book or graphic novel entitled "The Black Octopus," about a kid who's followed around by an evil entity who calls his phone and does other weird stuff, and then when he tells his friends and his mom, nobody believes him. I think you have a hot concept on your hands that people will absolutely love!

And if @dongodave doesn't run with the idea, somebody else might. Just ask JK Rowling…

 

[TheGreenPhantom]

I might run with it myself!

I wish I knew a good illustrator....