burnt said:If the experience felt real and it wasn't a dream then by default there is evidence it was real. Doesn't mean it was definitely real. But it sounds pretty real I dunno I didn't experience it.
The first thing I would do if I suspected being drugged is have my urine and blood collected and analyzed. I would look for scars injuries witnesses etc. But you said there is no evidence. So I can't really know all I have is my memory, which can also be studied as evidence but again you said there is no evidence so I can forget that.
But that doesn't imply the information doesn't exist. It just implies that my senses are too limited to figure it out. Thats not a big deal. Courts have to deal with these situations all the time. Humans are limited.
--- You can claim that you simply don’t know if it was real or not. Your first statement suggests this would be your answer. This might be the most reasonable answer of all. But this answer would require you to acknowledge that there are experiences whose objective reality cannot be determined. (An acknowledgement that you’ve never made on this forum.)
Well this is what I would say I don't know I can't claim to know things I can't know.
Of course there are situations where objective reality cannot be determined by a single human being who has no evidence beyond his own memory. I would be insane to think otherwise. That's why I stress objective evidence. You are saying there is no objective evidence which is impossible. There is ALWAYS information and evidence but that doesn't mean I as the human in the situation could ever figure it out.
I prefer the Jungian model because I know that he experienced schizophrenia and he wrote openly about the entities that he encountered within his psyche. His metaphors, in my opinion are about as refined and dead-on as anything I have ever read.
Jung was schizophrenic? I never heard that. If he was why are you taking him so seriously? Schizophrenia is a psychosis people who go through it are prone to delusions and hallucinations.
Okay burnt; that'll be it for me.
Your bigotry is sickening.
I tried. :lol:
You're simply an ignoramus.
Carl Jung was by far and away the most important thinker of our age as far as psychology is concerned, and your clearly stereotypical response only reveals your stature as an absolute, bull-headed, charlatan.
Peace-out.
8)
You do realize that shamanism and schizophrenia go hand in hand, right? Have you done psychedelics? I am beginning to question your validity as a psychonaut. If you don't think that these realms are the realms of the schizophrenic mind, then you clearly aren't taking enough to truly perturb your mind. Either that, or you haven't read enough into it to form a proper opinion and you are just making yourself look like a complete ass. (hint, hint.)