That's 5 minutes in the penalty box for excessive punning.Spiralout said:In short, the answer is yes: if you pay close attention to your solution, the crystals should precipitate out quicker.
:thumb_up:

Good question actually, this non chemist kitchen fidler with coffee filters doesn't know, over to the real chemists please: is it this one? Zinc ammonium acetateDaaren said:...I did the separation using ammonia.
And the transformation of harmaline to thh using zinc powder and vinegar.
I then filtered and precipitated the thh using ammonia only.
What would be the salt in this case?...
THH is precipitated with ammonia as a free base, not as a salt.And the transformation of harmaline to thh using zinc powder and vinegar.
I then filtered and precipitated the thh using ammonia only.
What would be the salt in this case?

This is good practice. I do the same, reduce about 30% and then add additional salt for a second round of manske (I manske 5 times, so 10 total). In the future I think I will combine all the manske waters and do a more aggressive reduction, so I don't have to do the second round more than once.Daaren said:Just for the sake of the experiment i also reduced the leftover water of a manske and after a night of sitting in the fridge more alks crashed out and the water/vinegar on top was now clear.
Promises, promises. Life happened, then my camera broke. Someday in the not too distant future I still hope to do this.I said:I will provide a pictorial for this in the near future.
Sorry for the misunderstanding! With ammonia you will still see a zinc hydroxide precipitate, at least sometimes. Or perhaps a basic zinc acetate gel - it can get a bit complicated even with this seemingly simple selection of cations and anions.Daaren said:In my case since i used ammonia it could not be zinc carbonate or zinc hydroxide...
Things have been looking promising with ammonia and phosphoric acid after a magnesium reduction. Magnesium ammonium phosphate crashes fromaround pH 5.5 and only takes harmine with it in a tail-end fraction at pH 6.2. Nothing comes down after that until ca. pH 8. This suggests to me that ammonium phosphate buffering might help when basing with ammonia, perhaps even without the involvement of magnesium.doubledog said:downwardsfromzero said:Adding the bicarb very cautiously should minimise the harmaline co-precipitation, surely?
Probably yes, with pH kept low, hopefully just harmine precipitates.
downwardsfromzero said:I'll take a look at the figures and consider what might be a more effective base for this separation. There must be a more effective way - or is it unavoidably a matter of repeated A/B cycles?
Would be great to find some specific base just for this separation. What about some very weakly basic salt?