Another Rube
Nublet will do.
I know no body asked for it, but I'd just like to give you my perspective anyway, because, hey, I can. :lol:
Another rube thinks a few of Art's points were rather astute, and while he was acting out of good intentions, his attitude did certainly come on a little strong. The question of whether the subject matter, of necessity, possibly required said attitude, is one that another rube thinks only really Art can answer, seeing as it's his post that is being.. I don't know, currently discussed.
Perhaps Art's post could have been a little more constructive, and a little less suggestive? Just an idea, what do you think? (you, Art, Datura, anyone else that's interested in adding their opinion to this soft boil of ideas)
(autophagia, lol, thanks)
Datura, if you look at Art's points, perhaps without the attitude that accompanies them, do you think there's anything worthy of taking away from them?
I think it would be nice if we, when in an argument, discussion, or, heh, mutual rhetoric, focused on expressing not only one aspect of how we feel about one's input, but all aspects. You know, the good points and the bad, to use a vastly over-abused dichotomous system of assigning value.
What are your opinions?
"Well, I'll start. Your metacraptalk is enough to do my head in." Mutters the little cynic, whilst making a noose to my collar.
Another rube thinks a few of Art's points were rather astute, and while he was acting out of good intentions, his attitude did certainly come on a little strong. The question of whether the subject matter, of necessity, possibly required said attitude, is one that another rube thinks only really Art can answer, seeing as it's his post that is being.. I don't know, currently discussed.
Perhaps Art's post could have been a little more constructive, and a little less suggestive? Just an idea, what do you think? (you, Art, Datura, anyone else that's interested in adding their opinion to this soft boil of ideas)
(autophagia, lol, thanks)
Datura, if you look at Art's points, perhaps without the attitude that accompanies them, do you think there's anything worthy of taking away from them?
I think it would be nice if we, when in an argument, discussion, or, heh, mutual rhetoric, focused on expressing not only one aspect of how we feel about one's input, but all aspects. You know, the good points and the bad, to use a vastly over-abused dichotomous system of assigning value.
What are your opinions?
"Well, I'll start. Your metacraptalk is enough to do my head in." Mutters the little cynic, whilst making a noose to my collar.