• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Freeze Precip Help

Migrated topic.
Sort by date Sort by votes
[quote:5fedec7725="Noman"]How about humoring us then, since by talking to you and continuing to allow you to post, we are all complicit in the crimes to which you are openly admitting? They probably won't go after an individual, they will go after a whole site.[/quote:5fedec7725] Yeah, sure. Didn't mean to disrespect anyone here, sorry about the confusion.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
[quote:9a57559ab4="zero"]And obviously its your choice to take the risk, however small it is, in posting your face right next to a jar of a Schedule I substance that holds anywhere from 5-20 years imprisonment for its manufacture. Good idea. The risk isnt so much in internet cops scouring sites for drug manufacturers, although it does happen. I have a friend serving 7 years right now on a drug charge... and the evidence that finally convicted him... post from an internet forum that the DEA printed out and submitted into evidence for the case. If you'd like to write him and ask him about the details of his case and how he feels about it, Id be glad to give you his booking information. The point is that have been forum busts and home raids in the past. Do a little research brother... it happened in Australia and that wasnt too long ago. What do you think the supporting evidence was? I doubt you're old enough to know what happened with the now defunct www.dmtworld.org Anyway, do what you like. Back to the original subject, didnt mean to jack the thread. I'll be posting pictures soon of me selling crack to mid-schoolers.[/quote:9a57559ab4] Hey, c'mon, I'm on your side here. No need for the sarcasm. From now on I will use a round-a-bout way of saying "I". Notice: I never mentioned what the substance was I am pictured with. Also, they could search my house all they wanted, they wont find any of this. All of these pictures were taken in a different location, then posted from my campus computer. I am in the clear, the only reason I will use SWIM (even though that does nothing to obsolve you of any crime) is to keep this site out of trouble.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Ahhh, dont take offense to the sarcasm man, just making a point. But sites have been shut down, so yeah, if you dont do it for yourself, we do appreciate you doing it for the site. Now back to the good stuff.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
ok XENONSION, that is the BEST FUCKING FORUM PIC i have EVER seen! LMFAO! hahahahahhaahha, that kid in the red lol, jesus! but ok really... i think SWIM stands for "Some Willing Individual Motherfucker", ive put that in place whenever someone says SWIM and it makes sense. lol,
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
[quote:490bc045f6="The Vegetarian"]ok XENONSION, that is the BEST FUCKING FORUM PIC i have EVER seen! LMFAO! hahahahahhaahha, that kid in the red lol, jesus! but ok really... i think SWIM stands for "Some Willing Individual Motherfucker", ive put that in place whenever someone says SWIM and it makes sense. lol,[/quote:490bc045f6] Same Way I Muffdive? lol
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Seriously though, does anyone think the 'SWIM' thing would stand up as a defence in court? Has it ever gone to court and helped someone get off? I suspect that both the police and the judges are intelligent enough not to be fooled by a 4 letter acronym. If anyone knows better I'd love to hear.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
It's just a very basic common sense thing... if they have a case and the rest of the evidence may be weak but they can prove that you openly admitted to the crime, you're done. If all evidence is weak and they have you talking about someone else doing something, well then they cant prove anything.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
SWIM does absolutely nothing as far as saving your ass in court. Best to use some sort of hearsay, i.e. "This guy I know...etc etc" But really, nothing works as you are explaining in detail a process that supposedly someone else is doing? No go.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Ok, you're not understanding the idea here dude. If you are not talking in first person than there is no admission of anything. People can be, and are, convicted of crimes with no evidence other than an open admission of the crime or a third party accusation of the crime. So, thats great that you know a former narcotics officer or whatever, but this is still common sense. I was in federal prison with a guy from Arizona who was convicted of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. He was not caught with meth, nor a meth lab. He was not caught with a recipe either. He was convicted by one person in the court saying that he had spoken about making meth many times and that he "even saw the lab once". So basically he was convicted for having a meth recipe in his head. 7 years. Bam. It still boils down to pure common fucking sense. Who wants to admit openly to manufacturing a Schedule I substance. I would never do something like that, but if I did, I certainly wouldn't fucking admit it! That's just ridiculous.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
[quote:f598ee0eb0="zero"]Ok, you're not understanding the idea here dude. If you are not talking in first person than there is no admission of anything. People can be, and are, convicted of crimes with no evidence other than an open admission of the crime or a third party accusation of the crime. So, thats great that you know a former narcotics officer or whatever, but this is still common sense. I was in federal prison with a guy from Arizona who was convicted of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. He was not caught with meth, nor a meth lab. He was not caught with a recipe either. He was convicted by one person in the court saying that he had spoken about making meth many times and that he "even saw the lab once". So basically he was convicted for having a meth recipe in his head. 7 years. Bam. It still boils down to pure common fucking sense. Who wants to admit openly to manufacturing a Schedule I substance. I would never do something like that, but if I did, I certainly wouldn't fucking admit it! That's just ridiculous.[/quote:f598ee0eb0] The non use of "SWIM" is not a big deal in terms of getting charged with consiracy. How about people posting teks? Should that not be allowed?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The point was, if you read the post thoroughly, that it is a reality that people are convicted of crimes simply through language, whether it be a verbal admission or a third party accusation... without any other evidence (as I already said). If you are too young or haven't had any serious interaction with our judicial system maybe you cant understand this yet. Hopefully it will never affect you. Posting teks is different. It's just information and there is no admission of prior, current or future, illegal activity. It is simply information. Do what you want man, lets get back to the freeze precipitation help, which this thread was initially about.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Back
Top Bottom