ijahdan said:
Gordotek, did you test your samples for cadmium too? I believe this is a more common and abundant contaminant of zinc than lead.
You say your friend DaBuzz successfully removed zinc and associated heavy metals (which ones specifically?) by performing a manske, thats good to know. Were your samples containing thh based using ammonia, but not manske'd? You say they tested negative for lead but what about zinc salts (which could contain cadmium)?
Its great that youre doing these kinds of analyses. A safe and foolproof thh tek which addresses all these issues cant be far off now.
OK - so the reason I choose to test for lead and not cadmium is because the zinc I recommend (and will likely be used by most people following my recommendation) is
ASTM D520 Type III specification, and if you look into that spec, you will see that the allowable lead (0.002%) is twice the allowable cadmium (0.001%), which I assume means lead contamination is likely higher than cadmium. The next reason is that both cadmium and the zinc salts are dissolved by ammonia and should not precipitate out (again, this is the primnary reason that ammonia, and not sodium carbonate, should be used for this reduction). Lead on the other hand, is
not dissolved by ammonia. So I have no reason to believe any cadmium whatsoever will be in the final product, especially if no lead is detectable.
Regarding the testing that DaBuzz did, he just used this home
water testing kit, so I have no idea how accurate that might be, all I can tell you is that initially it indicated "mid-range" (of its scale) contamination on dissolved THH sample that had been precipitated with sodium carbonate, he then did a manske, took the crystals, dissolved in a filter with boiling water, then precipitated with 2% ammonia, tested it again, and there was no indication of contamination with his 2nd round of testing using the same test kit. I don't really take much stock in this type of testing, but I suppose its better than nothing.
-Gordo