You can't prove a negative. As for me, I'll take all the radio waves possible and not worry about it.Bedazzle said:Proove them harmless.
:d
You can't prove a negative. As for me, I'll take all the radio waves possible and not worry about it.Bedazzle said:Proove them harmless.

Than what?benzyme said:I'd worry more about getting cancer from wearing a seatbelt

RayOfLight said:About a month ago my phone was cut off for lack of payment. I really don't miss it. What am i paying for ? the ability of anyone that has my number to summon me at their will and a brain tumor? no thanks. The only way I can see myself missing it is if I'm broken down on the side of the road or something but I don't think that justifies a monthly bill and possible negative health effects
Bedazzle said:
jamie said:
Probably also uses coltan.benzyme said:
Actually the article says "Controlled Study Reveals Link" in the actual text (not just the headline) and for a technology that has only been in really widespread use for 15 years or so, that is saying a lot. It took them longer than that to prove that DDT and asbestos cause cancer, and those things are clearly directly carcinogenic. Cell phone use is a bit more circuitous of a link than ingesting a carcinogenic substance that is not used in huge quantities (thus can be easily controlled for sample groups).Ice House said:jamie said:
The artcle in the link says that a study suggests cell phones are hazardous. The study didnt prove they are hazardous.
I can suggest anything I want, it doesnt mean its true.
obliguhl said:Please stop making assumptions just because you've "heard" something. I've also heard that santa claus exists....
This site Cell Phone Danger discusses a couple of the latest studies done on the topic and references them. Might be interesting to look at instead of relying on guesswork.
christian said:Proof, oh proof.... I think we already know there MIGHT be some serious long term health consequences, but they might only show up in out late 60's, like other diseases such as cancer do anyhow. Are we gonna wait for the proof, or are we gonna be sensible in knowing about "moderation in all things"??
kyrolima said:This is a topic, like all those "industry VS contra-industry"-threads, where the industry won't publish studies against their own technology.
By the way: It has been PROVEN, that bees are being irritated by cellphone-radiation - they seem to loose orientation, and this might be a reason for the death of many bees.
bee study
Personally I still use my mobile phone - but I rather use one with a low SAR.
Ice House said:jamie said:
The artcle in the link says that a study suggests cell phones are hazardous. The study didnt prove they are hazardous.
I can suggest anything I want, it doesnt mean its true.
) It doesn't seem unreasonable to me to be at least a bit concerned with them, especially after reading that study that found