Is the Quality versus DMT experience section needed?

[TransistorBass]

The forum has 'DMT Experience Reports' + 'Quality Experience Reports'
I have yet to add a 'Quality' EXP due to me not thinking my reports are not good enough or interesting enough be tagged in that way. (I guess this is what you get when we each have a personal journey)

Could someone explain the reasoning and intention behind these two forum sections and tell me if the intentions for them are working as intended?

Is the intention that people who use Template for comparative analysis of bioassays are supposed to post in the 'Quality' section? If so, it's not panning out like that is it. This would mean reports from each section should be moved to the other. So I'll assume some other reasoning.

Currently I would say that both sections serve the same purpose as none is really specific to a substance only the somewhat abstract "The crème de la crème" which is no good for me being dairy intolerant

Thanks

 

[blig-blug]

I think all new experience threads should go into the reports section initially, and then be moved by a mod to the quality section if it's particularly high quality. I'm not sure if it used to be like that in the old forum, but it makes more sense to me.

I agree it's pretty awkward and prone to failure to expect someone to classify their own reports as "normal" or "high quality".

Is the intention that people who use Template for comparative analysis of bioassays are supposed to post in the 'Quality' section?

I don't think so, as there are some quite old threads there that don't follow it.

I'm not sure if it's supposed to be how I say above or not. But if it's not, I think it's how it should be, personally.

 

[universecannon]

To add to what Mr. blug said, I don't think anyone can make new posts in the quality section anyways (at the bottom it says "You have insufficient privileges to post threads here" for me.)

 

[TransistorBass]

Thanks @blig-blug and ahhh so it does @universecannon I hadn't spotted that.