OK, so I've refrained from wading into this fracas, but at this point, I feel like I can no longer sit idly on the sidelines, and as I was the one who initially brought your horrendous (referring to the quality of the materials used as well as the overall lab procedure and tone set by you guys running around in costumes) extraction video into the eye of the nexus there are some things I'd like to say. First, as Amor_Fati already stated, it is my right to choose who I see as emissaries from the entheogenic community and
YOU, sirs, are no emissaries. I have no desire to engage in name calling, so please understand that everything I say is how I perceive the individuals who appeared in that video as well as my perceptions of you guys from the numerous posts you have now made. You are hot-headed, short-sighted (read your own comments as to how many things you didn't consider, or how many points you agree with us on) individuals who are self-labelled non-experts with no formal chemistry training and an inability to learn from written teks (by your own admission). Given all of this, I feel very strongly that you
SHOULD NOT be the voice of this community on youtube or through any other forum (being used in the general sense and not referring internet communities). Leary was, at least, a Harvard professor and clearly brilliant man, yet many people still saw a lot of problems with what he was doing. You sirs, are no Learys and have no right to claim to be acting in the same vein especially given the manner in which you attempted to "spread this knowledge".
Now, to digress for a moment, you say that you are in 100% "agreence" with us about "irrisponsible" use of salvia, yet you have posted these videos through your youtube account. First allow me to say, one of the reasons I do not want you representing the community
AT ALL is that from both your posts and youtube videos, you come across as incredibly inarticulate (Hell, this thread is titled "Knowledgestick's
defence response" ). I would
NEVER permit my interests to be presented by an individual I consider to be less articulate than myself, although, unfortunately it happens far too frequently. That being said, here was an opportunity for me to prevent that, and I did. Now, moving beyond your poor qualifications to be a spokesman for the entheogenic community, we come to these
videos from Knowledgestick's Youtube Channel:
These videos do not present someone smoking salvia while driving a car or on the top of someone's roof or while doing the Tosh Extreme Challenge, but this is not educational, imo. To have these guys in a room talking about the effects of salvia and the epiphanies and experiences it has created for them or about the mechanisms through which Salvinorin A affects an individual's perception would be extrememly beneficial videos. These however, do not present that sort of information. Again, these are videos that, while not wildly reckless, fall into the category of the type of youtube vids that got salvia criminalized in the first place.
Honestly, if you are a visual learner as you claim to be, what's wrong with extraction pictorials? Please explain to me what a video provides that a good pictorial does not? The nice thing about pictorials is that they do not need to be hosted on sites like youtube. To my mind, there is no rationale as to having extraction videos. If you are "so bad" at chemistry that you can't learn from reading teks over and over again (or posting help questions in a forum/chatting with forum members in a webchat) then I would say pictorial teks (not videos) are perfect for you. If after that you are still so unclear that forum posts/chats cannot clarify this process for you, you
SHOULD NOT be extracting. Many extractions include the use of strong bases and petrochemicals. If you can't conceptualize how to perform this procedure (even when given pictures) how can you be expected to safely work with these hazardous materials? One other point I'd like to use this section to segue into is the fact that in your video
you used impure materials (some sort of drain cleaner that was not 100% lye) and failed to observe anything even remotely resembling lab safety. I get that you claim that this is an "old" video, but I'm sorry, for a number of reasons, not the least of which being your tone/voice I feel that there has not been much time lapse between that video and now. If you were truly into harm reduction, why did you use poor chemicals and no lab safety? Are you seeing the contradictions inherent in your argument given the extraction video?
I believe I approached you in a calm, non-insulting way when I first posted on your youtube channel. Granted, I gave you an ultimatum; take down the vid or have it flagged to death, but I was nonetheless polite and avoided name calling. I then attempted to make clear the points as to why we flag videos on your youtube channel. That eventually did degrade to some name-calling on both sides of that debate. After the video was removed by you, I went so far as to thank you for removing it, as I figured you had finally understood the points I was trying to make. Here are two additional points to everything else I've said. With youtube videos there is no trouble-shooting. Again, you claim to make these videos so people have knowledge on how to do this safely. Ignoring the points I've already made with respect to that claim, watching a video does not equate to a good product. There are so many variables that can shift from one extraction to the next that there is no way you could claim someone watching your video is
guaranteed to have pure, uncontaminated dmt. With such a video tutorial, there is no one to ask for help if your extraction winds up looking very different from the video. Additionally, with viral youtube videos, just as with salvia, MHRB goes from being esoteric to being in the public view. This is something that should be avoided at all costs. The public is not demanding DMT, we are a small percent of the population. Those who want it will seek it out, it's not hard to find that you extract it from MHRB, why would you reveal that fact to every layperson? Not only is it non-sensical, it's unnecessary as many of them simply don't care or have no desire for that knowledge. The Feds have tolerated forums and the like, they know we're here and have turned a blind eye. Why would you prod a sleeping giant? Yes, prohibition must end, but this is not the way to around affecting that change. Have you heard of CEL? Here, take a look:
Coalition for Entheogenic Liberty - Welcome to the DMT-Nexus.
Finally, you need to understand, this is not about ego. This is not about me being supreme master and controller of the spice. Yes, Dune does say that he who controls the spice controls the universe, but universal control/world domination have never really been my cup of tea. I have taught people to extract in real life, I have taught people to extract via the internet. I am not a chem major, I am not a gate keeper, I am an individual who uses entheogens in a ritualistic context for exploring the nature of nature and consciousness. When I see a lack of respect toward something I have devoted nearly 20% of my life to, I take offense to that. I am not trying to stifle knowledge by any stretch. I am merely trying to prevent certain avoidable and potentially cataclysmic events from taking place due to careless people posting extraction videos. If you want to present information on DMT a la Rick Strassman and the various spirit molecule vids that are up, by all means, please do. I love those vids and watch all of them whenever I encounter new ones. There is much more I have to say, but I will wait for a response so that I am not seen as entirely dictating your repsonse and we do not retread old ground. I am glad to see your attitude change from your opening post. Honestly, after reading that, I really did not think I was going to reply at all. I am impressed with your willingness to engage in open conversation and not just flame people for taking offense with your video. Please keep up the discourse and explore what we offer here at the Nexus.
peace
SB