• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

New member in the area :)

Migrated topic.

Blind_Goat

Esteemed member
Hello,

I'm Blind_Goat. You can just refer to me as Blind or BG. It's ok. I'm searching for knowledge, not a native english speaker (sorry for any weird sentence construction, but i believe it can be turned in a good thing, like Joseph Conrad did), but I try to make my best. I'm very interested in DMT, LSA and LSD: extraction techniques, experiences and dosage. I like to think in complex questions of consciousness, and trying to write a book about it. I'm graduated in Philosophy: my thinking has this "accent" but I'm opened to learn with everybody.

In the past, i had experiences with a pletora of substances: ecstasy, LSD, DMT, Cocaine and mostly marijuana, but I really sticked only with DMT, LSD, LSA and marijuanna (and, of course, a homebrew beer. I apreciate it a lot).
 
I would certainly like to check out this aforementioned topic.

My first psychedelic experiences were with marijuana. Gave me a lot of insights. Under its effects, I filled out a total of 12 small notebooks that I use as if stored ideas in which I can articulate to compose larger texts.

I have been thinking since childhood about death. A lot of my experiences (notably with LSD) have been in noticing my presence in the world and the opportunity involved in it.

When I use microdoses of DMT (not enough to make the breakthrough) I have very vivid dreams involving, as a rule, my dog that died 2yrs ago.
 
Blind_Goat said:
Hello,

I'm Blind_Goat. You can just refer to me as Blind or BG. It's ok. I'm searching for knowledge, not a native english speaker (sorry for any weird sentence construction, but i believe it can be turned in a good thing, like Joseph Conrad did), but I try to make my best. I'm very interested in DMT, LSA and LSD: extraction techniques, experiences and dosage. I like to think in complex questions of consciousness, and trying to write a book about it. I'm graduated in Philosophy: my thinking has this "accent" but I'm opened to learn with everybody.

In the past, i had experiences with a pletora of substances: ecstasy, LSD, DMT, Cocaine and mostly marijuana, but I really sticked only with DMT, LSD, LSA and marijuanna (and, of course, a homebrew beer. I apreciate it a lot).

Nice to meet you, I graduated in Philosophy, too! What's your native language?
 
Blind_Goat said:
I would certainly like to check out this aforementioned topic.

My first psychedelic experiences were with marijuana. Gave me a lot of insights. Under its effects, I filled out a total of 12 small notebooks that I use as if stored ideas in which I can articulate to compose larger texts.

I have been thinking since childhood about death. A lot of my experiences (notably with LSD) have been in noticing my presence in the world and the opportunity involved in it.

When I use microdoses of DMT (not enough to make the breakthrough) I have very vivid dreams involving, as a rule, my dog that died 2yrs ago.

I'm interested in your writing and look forward to you sharing if you're so inclined :)

Jupiter Man said:
Nice to meet you, I graduated in Philosophy, too

Three philosphers walk into a forum... :lol:

One love
 
Blind_Goat said:
mine is portuguese, and yours?

English is my native language, but my genetics strongly come from Germany, so I can easily recognize the language. I think languages can be programmed into genetic memory. :D
 
downwardsfromzero said:
Jupiter Man said:
Blind_Goat said:
mine is portuguese, and yours?

English is my native language, but my genetics strongly come from Germany, so I can easily recognize the language. I think languages can be programmed into genetic memory. :D
You've clearly never tried learning Danish :lol:


Haha thanks!

Voidmatrix said:
I'm interested in your writing and look forward to you sharing if you're so inclined

yeah! I'm thinking a new approach to the problem...
in short, I think that due to the essentialist approach to the question, a lot has been thought about "what is consciousness" and little progress has been made on the subject. We ask about conscience as Plato thought about justice. Naturally, this approach is not fruitless, but limited, as it hides a facet of the question that interests us equally, namely: how does consciousness operate?

Assuming that consciousness would be made possible by a material medium, it makes sense that if a certain organization of materiality is the case, it would also be, by necessity, that this organization of materiality be repeatable, that is: that consciousness is repeatable. So the question is not what consciousness is, but whether or not it is repeatable. My investigation starts from there.
 
Jupiter Man said:
Blind_Goat said:
mine is portuguese, and yours?

English is my native language, but my genetics strongly come from Germany, so I can easily recognize the language. I think languages can be programmed into genetic memory. :D


It is a bold thesis. Meets resistance at university but I can understand that we understand little about DNA
 
Blind_Goat said:
downwardsfromzero said:
Jupiter Man said:
Blind_Goat said:
mine is portuguese, and yours?

English is my native language, but my genetics strongly come from Germany, so I can easily recognize the language. I think languages can be programmed into genetic memory. :D
You've clearly never tried learning Danish :lol:


Haha thanks!

Voidmatrix said:
I'm interested in your writing and look forward to you sharing if you're so inclined

yeah! I'm thinking a new approach to the problem...
in short, I think that due to the essentialist approach to the question, a lot has been thought about "what is consciousness" and little progress has been made on the subject. We ask about conscience as Plato thought about justice. Naturally, this approach is not fruitless, but limited, as it hides a facet of the question that interests us equally, namely: how does consciousness operate?

Assuming that consciousness would be made possible by a material medium, it makes sense that if a certain organization of materiality is the case, it would also be, by necessity, that this organization of materiality be repeatable, that is: that consciousness is repeatable. So the question is not what consciousness is, but whether or not it is repeatable. My investigation starts from there.

I highly recommend, no wait, I urge you to look into the booke "Godel, Escher, Bach" by Douglas R Hofstadter. :D

One love
 
Voidmatrix said:
Blind_Goat said:
downwardsfromzero said:
Jupiter Man said:
Blind_Goat said:
mine is portuguese, and yours?

English is my native language, but my genetics strongly come from Germany, so I can easily recognize the language. I think languages can be programmed into genetic memory. :D
You've clearly never tried learning Danish :lol:


Haha thanks!

Voidmatrix said:
I'm interested in your writing and look forward to you sharing if you're so inclined

yeah! I'm thinking a new approach to the problem...
in short, I think that due to the essentialist approach to the question, a lot has been thought about "what is consciousness" and little progress has been made on the subject. We ask about conscience as Plato thought about justice. Naturally, this approach is not fruitless, but limited, as it hides a facet of the question that interests us equally, namely: how does consciousness operate?

Assuming that consciousness would be made possible by a material medium, it makes sense that if a certain organization of materiality is the case, it would also be, by necessity, that this organization of materiality be repeatable, that is: that consciousness is repeatable. So the question is not what consciousness is, but whether or not it is repeatable. My investigation starts from there.

I highly recommend, no wait, I urge you to look into the booke "Godel, Escher, Bach" by Douglas R Hofstadter. :D

One love

I'm reading it at this very moment. What aspect of it do you think is the most important?
 
Blind_Goat said:
I'm reading it at this very moment. What aspect of it do you think is the most important?

I'm not sure how far in you are, but I can't limit my answer to one aspect :)

The things that stuck out the most to me (partly because I was already interested in them) are his use of paradoxical facets (which his stance seems to change over time, and he doesn't lean so much towards paradoxes being something that needs to be solved), nesting, recursion, the implications of the Incompleteness Theorems, the implications of TNT and other formal logical systems, ways in which these aspects can be seen in other "closed" systems such as music, the mind, DNA... I could go on. I love that book. I'm actually about to reread it soon.

BTW, we're best friends now :D

One love
 
Back
Top Bottom