ShadedSelf said:
Do you blame your dad for ending up where you are now?
Not particularly, no, likely because I've desired a fair amount of autonomy since childhood. I do blame him for his actions, past and present, that have and do have negative impact on myself and others and for certain traumas that were a result of some interaction with him, but not for where I am now. I could, but I don't. Even if it were something that we could say is true, it's not as true as the fact that I have to take action to better myself. What's done is done.
ShadedSelf said:
Why didn't you want to have attachment to good?
To paraphrase from the above, it was perceived in many philosophies and practices that attachment detracts from Enlightenment/Transcendence. To be fair, some describe me as an intense person, and I may have taken this idea too far, too seriously, too literally, etc.
Also, if able to maintain that state, there's not really much you have to worry about counting on...
ShadedSelf said:
I get this sense that good things come at a cost, that you cant really trust them, and that the better things are that just means that you are failing to see where the bad is.
Almost like they are waiting for you to let your guard down to show their ugly face.
Does that make any sense?
I think this is one good way to put it and it sums some aspects of this up.
ShadedSelf said:
Something that I get from the way you write is certantly "detachment", though it feels more like "separation" to me.
And Im sure there is a lot of genuine love for philosophy and spirituality, but it also sounds like you might have used some of it as a coping mechanism, and btw if that resonates, Im not blaming you for it, its totally fine.
I spent many years misappropriating "non-attachment" for "detachment," which are very different, though related, and yes I would say has led to "separation" which I may be prone to because I've experienced states and senses of deep separation throughout my life.
Can you elaborate more on your observation on how I may use those topics as coping mechanisms? It's not that I disagree, I just want to make sure I am understanding you. I would definitely say my attraction towards the ideals of Enlightenment/Transcendence could've been kinds of coping mechanisms. If I aim to be as selfless as possible, without bias, etc, then I don't have to worry about myself, or my healing and/or traumas, right? If there's nothing to attach too, then there's nothing to be hurt by, right? Impractical. Errors of thinking. We live and we learn. It's just hard to change much of this.
ShadedeSelf said:
How does it feel to have your own pespective, subjectivity and opinions diminished?
Whatever the feeling is, Im sure it also feels familiar.
That's a loaded question :lol:. With how I've done it to myself, it feels honest, even though I am also left at a loss in some regards. With regards to other people (such as my father, or peers in social situations), it can make me feel undervalued, unheard, inferior, etc. While there's a different felt sense in both of these perspectives of this facet of the topic, they are intertwined and can very likely be connected to experiences when I was younger. I shouldn't allow noticing my own limits lead to a devaluing of my perspective, subjectivity, opinions, etc.
One love