Was sitting at work yesterday for a few hours tooln around on the laptop before getting some work done and came across this post by Paul Stamets. Bad coding maybe. Lazy & shortsited code imo. The whole thing's sort've funny to me, especially with the fact that they rejected his appeal, wut? lmao. Between their automated segment and their manual review, just seems inexcusable in terms of what's deemed to specific categories. Makes little sense given much of what else is on youtube. I guess granularity goes out the window with some folks over at youtube/google. What're they payin those guys over there. 
