• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Polymorphic properties of DMT

Migrated topic.
Thank you so much Mindlusion for the info 🙏

The other day I was pouring a warm-to-room temp cloudy DMT naphtha solution out of a jar and it became clear after pouring. Was it because I mechanically disrupted the xtal seeds? Is it important to not disrupt them or letting them re-form before colling further?

Thanks again 🙏
 
Loveall said:
Thank you so much Mindlusion for the info 🙏

The other day I was pouring a warm-to-room temp cloudy DMT naphtha solution out of a jar and it became clear after pouring. Was it because I mechanically disrupted the xtal seeds? Is it important to not disrupt them or letting them re-form before colling further?

Thanks again 🙏

It sounds to me like yes, you probably have redissolved them. I wouldn't be too concerned though because it sounds like it was still very early in the crystallization process, so if everything redissolved, it will just start again and get back to where it was very quickly, so it won't affect the final outcome. Typically I do all my transfers while it is still warm or close to room temp, but once it is in the crystallization flask I try not to touch it at all until waiting 12-18 hours unless to transfer it to the fridge or freezer.
 
Loveall said:
I'm leaning towards forgoing handling freebase altogether and simply moving towards a salt soluble in PG (like DMT citrate).

Can you please elaborate on that?

Is salt-DMT vapeable??? If so, which salt would be better???

This has been in my mind since ever! Never had the guts to try it myself but just about to...
------------------------

To the point of this discussion... if the polymorphs exist as such, I wonder what would their pharmacokinetics would be.

Will digestion monomerize the polymorphs before absorption? Do we have specific enzymes for that (tryptophan polymorphs as storage)? Will oligomers have distinct absorption rates through all tissues? Do polymorphs or oligomers invade synapses? Do they interact with receptors? How would they modulate the effects?

Wonderful subject this one.
 
Ruffles said:
Loveall said:
I'm leaning towards forgoing handling freebase altogether and simply moving towards a salt soluble in PG (like DMT citrate).

Can you please elaborate on that?

Is salt-DMT vapeable??? If so, which salt would be better???

This has been in my mind since ever! Never had the guts to try it myself but just about to...
------------------------

To the point of this discussion... if the polymorphs exist as such, I wonder what would their pharmacokinetics would be.

Will digestion monomerize the polymorphs before absorption? Do we have specific enzymes for that (tryptophan polymorphs as storage)? Will oligomers have distinct absorption rates through all tissues? Do polymorphs or oligomers invade synapses? Do they interact with receptors? How would they modulate the effects?

Wonderful subject this one.


There is no monomerization, there is no difference in absorption because there is no difference in properties. Once DMT is in the solution phase, or virtually any other phase (gas, and liquid) the DMT molecules assume their regular free rotation and the molecules become absolutely indistinguishable. The purpose of my previous post was to highlight this fact by looking at DMT 1H NMR, and comparing it with a molecule that does exhibit different chemical environments in the solution phase, although I admit it was not really fully fleshed out. Polymorphism is very common among organic compounds, because organic molecules have a high degree of complexity, so a low degree of symmetry (lots of possible bond rotations and conformations, and ways to pack inside a solid crystal). Chocolate (cocoa butter) has something like 6 unique polymorphs, with specific ones being ideal (give you a chocolate that is solid at room temperature and has a good texture when you bite into it).

The point is, that has been missed, is that these interactions are only relevant in the solid phase or in the liquid-to-solid phase transition. It is only when the molecules are tightly packed, like in a solid or a liquid, and the temperature is low enough (to solidify), that the bond rotation becomes significantly hindered enough so that different chemical environments arise, and those differences express themselves with different chemical properties, like melting point, color, and in their spectrograph. Just like it doesn't make any sense to inquire about a chemical compound's density when it's in the gas phase, or a metals malleability and tensile strength while it's in a liquid phase, it doesn't make any sense to inquire about a polymorphs properties beyond the solid phase. You're not alone in this misinterpretation in this thread as well as other threads describing something similar, and referring to it as an "oligomerization" or "polymerization" (which, for added confusion, should really be referring to the formation of covalent bonds, not the non-covalent interactions being discussed here) which led to a lot of chasing ghosts and theorizing based on the incorrect interpretation of the phenomenon and misunderstanding of the diving forces at work. For the same reasons, it doesn't make sense to talk about pi-stacking interactions taking place in solution, to cause aggregation of molecules in the solution phase (especially aqueous solution) which is taking the interactions out of their actual context.

The crux of what we are discussing here, the phase properties of matter, and it is an extremely deep question in of itself, and not very intuitive at the most fundamental level. It should start with asking questions like "why are gasses compressible and why are liquids incompressible?" the phases of matter are not elementary properties of the individual atoms or molecules, but instead are emergent properties out of how matter is interacting with itself. The important thing to remember then, the environment dictates what forces will determine the behavior of the system. For example, the weak intermolecular forces that bind molecules together in a solid, are not at all relevant they are dissolved in solution. Or often we will talk about how powerful water hydrogen bonding is, so much that it can stay liquid up to 100C at 1atm, except above that temperature, even though it possesses this powerful property, water suddenly doesn't seem so special, because its hydrogen bonding is no longer relevant in the gas-phase.

You can even sort of think of it like a government, or the properties of people as a whole compared to their fundamental properties as individuals. The force of government will not dictate the properties of any one individual person, but it will supress some properties it doesn't wish to see, and encourage others, and that can change the properties/behavior of the system of a whole. When that regime changes, the behavior of the system changes, not because anything new has been injected into it, but what properties of the individuals that were already there underlying it, and it will change dramatically until it reaches a new equilibrium, which is an energy intensive process. This is like a phase-transition. Perhaps a better example, is when you transition from dreaming consciousness to waking consciousness, or after taking a good dose of a psychedelic. Your consciousness is undergoing a phase transition, because the boundary forces that are governing your current state of consciousness has changed, and different properties can emerge.

Another, even more primordial example, is even in the fundamental forces underlying the universe itself. We know of one clear example where the entire universe underwent a phase transition, during the rapid cooling and expansion the electroweak regime transitioned into the current regime, where before, you had a single electroweak force, to now you have the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces. This completely blew my mind when I first conceptualized it in this way. And it points to, and leads you to wonder what forces and what phenomena are really truly fundamental. In the same way that if you have liquid water and rapidly reduce the pressure, the hydrogen bonding isn't enough to keep the water together as a liquid and it transitions into a gas where that hydrogen bonding 'force' no longer exists. The electroweak force no longer exists in our universe as a driving interaction (but it still exists!), but at one point it was as real as electromagnetism today, and these conditions can be recreated in a particle accelerator.
 
The polymorphic properties of dmt can be traced to its origin in nature as the ubiquitous amino acid, tryptophan. The partial rotatability of its (tryptophan's) alpha and beta carbons is what permits its participation in protein-folding. Obviously, chirality is lost upon decarboxylation. And of course, as a salt, the orientation of the molecule is 'locked', so to speak.
 
Ruffles said:
Loveall said:
I'm leaning towards forgoing handling freebase altogether and simply moving towards a salt soluble in PG (like DMT citrate).

Can you please elaborate on that?

Is salt-DMT vapeable??? If so, which salt would be better???

This has been in my mind since ever! Never had the guts to try it myself but just about to...
------------------------

To the point of this discussion... if the polymorphs exist as such, I wonder what would their pharmacokinetics would be.

Will digestion monomerize the polymorphs before absorption? Do we have specific enzymes for that (tryptophan polymorphs as storage)? Will oligomers have distinct absorption rates through all tissues? Do polymorphs or oligomers invade synapses? Do they interact with receptors? How would they modulate the effects?

Wonderful subject this one.

DMT-salt is "vapable" in PG, but that is a misnomer. What can be done is aerosolize the salt in an e-juice and the tiny dropplets carry the salt, same as the very popular nicotine salts have been doing for the past few years in the "vaping" world.

IDK about the "best salt". I think we would prefer one that is stable at the "vaping" temp of ~200C (citrate is not, but fumaric and acetic should be) and is also soluble in PG at least at the 20% level. There is a discussion here.
 
referring to it as an "oligomerization" or "polymerization" (which, for added confusion, should really be referring to the formation of covalent bonds, not the non-covalent interactions being discussed here) which led to a lot of chasing ghosts and theorizing based on the incorrect interpretation of the phenomenon and misunderstanding of the diving forces at work.

Yes, understood your point more clearly now. Thank you mindlusion for the deep and beautiful observations on the phase properties of matter and the connection to DMT.

Also, thank you loveall for the point and the link to a thread about vaping (aerosolizing) magic salts.

Much love to you!
 
Ruffles said:
referring to it as an "oligomerization" or "polymerization" (which, for added confusion, should really be referring to the formation of covalent bonds, not the non-covalent interactions being discussed here) which led to a lot of chasing ghosts and theorizing based on the incorrect interpretation of the phenomenon and misunderstanding of the diving forces at work.

Yes, understood your point more clearly now. Thank you mindlusion for the deep and beautiful observations on the phase properties of matter and the connection to DMT.

Also, thank you loveall for the point and the link to a thread about vaping (aerosolizing) magic salts.

Much love to you!

No problem, I should clarify because it was asked:

To the point of this discussion... if the polymorphs exist as such, I wonder what would their pharmacokinetics would be.

Will digestion monomerize the polymorphs before absorption?
Do we have specific enzymes for that (tryptophan polymorphs as storage)? Will oligomers have distinct absorption rates through all tissues? Do polymorphs or oligomers invade synapses? Do they interact with receptors? How would they modulate the effects?

The first two questions are actually legitimate questions when it comes to polymorphs, drug pharmacokinetics. Just not DMT, in this case, and I wanted to clarify that by stating clearly what a polymorph actually is.

But, polymorphs can indeed affect a drugs pharmacokinetics. For instance, if you had a drug with a polymorph that had a lower solubility, or a formulation that took a lot more time to dissolve in acidic water, it will definitely affect the drugs oral bioavailability. This is certainly the case with large peptide drugs, which can have many polymorphs by their nature, and being not easily ionized or solubilized in water, depending on the peptide. Small, easily ionized molecules like DMT don't fit into this category, because of how easily they can be solubilized and ionized.
 
The second the highlighted sentence, "Will digestion monomerize the polymorphs before absorption?", appears to betray a misunderstanding. 'Polymorph' is not synonymous with 'polymer'.

While ML explained this quite exhaustively the first time around, it seems worthwhile to highlight this point explicitly and in isolation. The words do look and sound fairly similar :)
 
has anyone done any research/tests into influencing DMT polymorphism when taking an actively precipitating saturated solvent mixture and subjecting it to ultrasonication? i read as a passing comment/observation, in a research paper that ultrasonication can inhibit polymorphism, not even through the continuous exposure during precipitation/crystalization, just a few minutes at first, as it encourages nucleation, as well as breaking up particles into very consistent smaller ones, resulting in a lot of very similar shape/size crystals growing afterwards, like, seeding using precisely controlled micron seed particles.

I tried this with some dmt fumarate im struggling with in IPA and it sped things up a great deal, so far its all solid fluff and no liquid blob has formed like the last 2 times. not the same though as crystalizing the freebase but, i thought it was worth noting.
 
Can you explain more clearly how exactly you did the ultrasonication?

If I understood correctly, you had some DMT fumarate to recrystallize in (boiling) IPA and you put the vial with loaded IPA in a ultrasonic bath like equipment filled with water? Or was the loaded IPA itself on the ultrasonic bath?
 
Can you explain more clearly how exactly you did the ultrasonication?

If I understood correctly, you had some DMT fumarate to recrystallize in (boiling) IPA and you put the vial with loaded IPA in a ultrasonic bath like equipment filled with water? Or was the loaded IPA itself on the ultrasonic bath?
yeah it was a small RBF i dunked into a cleaning bath. DMT fumarate takes a while to precipitate back out so it was already room temperature too.


The treatment caused it to kind of self-seed in an ideal way, making micro-particles, which rapidly grow, then break to form more ideal microparticles, resulting in a net multiplication of nucleation sites.
i still wound up with goo in the end, however this time it wasnt immediate, about 1/4 of the mass was crystals before the sticky gooey crystals came out and dissolved everything. but unlike last time, until disturbed, i still had actual solids (defs not just FA), so that was the closest i got to success before giving up and just processing the goo instead.
 
A reddish goo? Due perhaps to water in your IPA?

Interesting experiment, was the ultrasonic back on for how long?
nah, most likely, jungle spice fumarates. drying pure DMT fumarate from water transfer is very easy to do, this was like trying to dry honey even using the oven, and water was never in the equation except possibly from aldol condensation of acetone since it was initially precipitated with FASA, but that same FASA also was used to precipitate a purer source of DMT and produced instant snowy flakes as expected.

the ultrasonic was run for about 30 seconds, its just supposed to augment the initial precipitation conditions. once precipitation begins seriously though, if the molecules are sticky it will cause a coagulation of them instead. so in that regard, it can accelerate failure if failure is on the horizon, goo/liquid precipitate will grow, dry/solid crystals will merely multiply but providing an ideal starting point/nucleation site, and because they all end up being aproximately the same, according to what i read, prevents polymorphism occuring.
 
Last edited:
nah, most likely, jungle spice fumarates. drying pure DMT fumarate from water transfer is very easy to do, this was like trying to dry honey even using the oven, and water was never in the equation except possibly from aldol condensation of acetone since it was initially precipitated with FASA, but that same FASA also was used to precipitate a purer source of DMT and produced instant snowy flakes as expected.
Gotcha. But one thing is the FASA precipitation in non-polars, the other is the IPA re-x, it might behave differently.

I have fractioned a loaded IPA (with already very pure FASA from xylene) by serially doing a room temp precipitation for 3 days, collected tan hard chunky crystals. Then freezer precipitation for 3 days collecting yellow to white needle starry clusters. Then I dried the IPA expecting just white excess fumaric which led to what is accurately described as a reddish honey, that was difficult to oven dry. Became like a plastic stuck in caramel like glass that when manipulated came back to a thicker honey state. I assumed it was due to picking up water while drying the IPA at room temp, then oven drying it lost the water back to solid like but manipulating made it pick up water again turning gooey. Also considered that perhaps the whiter forms of DMT have more fumaric to it and the yellow to red ones less? The red goo smells strongly like freebase does, way more than DMT fumarate. Never tried it, especially because the other forms are pliable. The goo should work well for e-vaping.

the ultrasonic was run for about 30 seconds, its just supposed to augment the initial precipitation conditions. once precipitation begins seriously though, if the molecules are sticky it will cause a coagulation of them instead. so in that regard, it can accelerate failure if failure is on the horizon, goo/liquid precipitate will grow, dry/solid crystals will merely multiply but providing an ideal starting point/nucleation site, and because they all end up being aproximately the same, according to what i read, prevents polymorphism occuring.
I thought the sonication would have to last for many hours to days to have any significant effect on crystallization. But I see your point. Any strong crystal seedlings at the starting point should greatly improve crystallization. I can give it a try next time.
 
Gotcha. But one thing is the FASA precipitation in non-polars, the other is the IPA re-x, it might behave differently.

I have fractioned a loaded IPA (with already very pure FASA from xylene) by serially doing a room temp precipitation for 3 days, collected tan hard chunky crystals. Then freezer precipitation for 3 days collecting yellow to white needle starry clusters. Then I dried the IPA expecting just white excess fumaric which led to what is accurately described as a reddish honey, that was difficult to oven dry. Became like a plastic stuck in caramel like glass that when manipulated came back to a thicker honey state. I assumed it was due to picking up water while drying the IPA at room temp, then oven drying it lost the water back to solid like but manipulating made it pick up water again turning gooey. Also considered that perhaps the whiter forms of DMT have more fumaric to it and the yellow to red ones less? The red goo smells strongly like freebase does, way more than DMT fumarate. Never tried it, especially because the other forms are pliable. The goo should work well for e-vaping.


I thought the sonication would have to last for many hours to days to have any significant effect on crystallization. But I see your point. Any strong crystal seedlings at the starting point should greatly improve crystallization. I can give it a try next time.
what you just described was exactly what i experienced, a reddish honey like caramel/candy, and smelled strongly of freebase (is it not supposed to smell that way?)
I would very much like to learn what the deal is there, but my going theory if not DMT oxide is just that this is the behaviour of things other than DMT, that perhaps jungle spices, NMT, etc, things accuminata is known to have an abundance of, dont play nice even as fumarates.
Btw in my case i had a large excess of fumaric acid, i even managed to wash quite a bit out of the initial precipitate goo, so imo i dont think its a lack of fumaric-ions
 
Well, the crystalline D fumarate has a faint smell so the gooey D fumarate surprised me.

I always over FASA the no polar. So I guess the material before IPA re-x was contaminated, but I figured that during fractioning precipitation this excess would partition to more saturated fumarate D, if that makes sense? (Surely it won't, I lack the proper chem talk)

I know nothing about jungleyness and NMT and oxides on my mimosa derived materials. As far as I know, it should be mainly DMT and fumaric acid, either bound to each other or not, so freebase D, D fumarate and fumaric acid is what comes out of it... Marquis reagent shows brown for any type of D and that's what I get in any of the fractions... Pure fumaric acid gives no color in it. But no TLC or MS.

I have seen many colors and morphologies in DMT fumarate re-X in IPA (pun intended). Clear white powder, yellow flakes, chunky tanned, red goo, red blocky crystals, dark yellow krispies. Very interested in knowing why as well.
 
The second the highlighted sentence, "Will digestion monomerize the polymorphs before absorption?", appears to betray a misunderstanding. 'Polymorph' is not synonymous with 'polymer'.

While ML explained this quite exhaustively the first time around, it seems worthwhile to highlight this point explicitly and in isolation. The words do look and sound fairly similar :)
I've held this misunderstanding too. I think I get it now, though. At least polymorphs. Still need to read through the polymer threads.

DMT polymerization can (only?) occur in solution though, right? In contrast to polymorphism being a purely solid phase attribute. Would polymers be expected to crystallize at all or would they always be goo? Could they co-crystallize with the monomers or in any way affect the monomer polymorphs? Falkenberg references 4 molecules per unit cell in one polymorph, and 8 per unit cell in the other. Is that basically saying crystallized dimers?

Pardon the necroposting...
I have some observances, and theories. First, I've noticed that lower-melting polymorphs (m.p. 41-44 C) tend to readily turn yellow with exposure to air. I don't think this is due to any impurity, but a matter of autooxidation. This doesn't mean N-oxide formation, but rather, loss of electrons from the 2-3-positions on indole. I suspect this occurs when the molecule is oriented in a way where the terminal amine is folded closer to the pyrrole amine, about the alpha carbon (polymorphism is possible because of partial rotatability about the alpha carbon of tryptamine). The lower-melting polymorph is often a waxy, orange amorphous solid.
Also, the higher-melting polymorph (60s C),(a quasi-trans orientation, if you will) tends to yellow very slowly, and retains tight, white granular crystalline structure. That orientation, with the terminal amine furthest from the pyrolle moiety, has something of a shielding effect. Diisopropyl/Isopropyl-subbed tryptamines tend to limit the folding, due to steric hindrance; those tryptamines don't readily turn the telltale orange/ochre color of tryptamine or dmt.
I recently got a spectrum of solid, clear crystals ranging from colorless to yellow to orange. All with ~66 C melting points. Seems to contradict the theory that higher MP form is related to rate of color change. Well I guess I haven't measured any changes over time, but all shades of the clear crystals were formed together within 24 hours, so initial color doesn't seem to have anything to do with MP.


View attachment VID_0002.mp4IMG_0831.jpeg

Results shared here. Some agglomerates had both yellow and colorless formations. It appears the bi-colored specimens depended on which half of the crystal was in what solvent. Crystals precipitated out of a re-x'd yellow goo that was suspended between alkaline water and a small volume of oversaturated hexane. Yellow crystals protruded into the water, colorless protruded into hexane. Actually, looking at the stir rod the solvent divider may not be true, but the clear crystals always formed on top of yellow ones. If the yellow is related to oxidation, could that happen from contact with basic water?


Also, I'm generally confused how the Gaujac study concluded there are only two polymorphs with two specific MP ranges, when there are MP's that fall above and below the Form I and Form II they document. Could the lower MP simply be from more defects in the macro crystal from the co-existence of two forms?

For example, let's call polymorph 1 a triangle and polymorph 2 a square. Gaujac suggests a pure triangle formation has a lower MP and pure squares have a higher MP. And then the triangles change into squares for some reason.

But what if the lower MP is just an intermolecularly weak mix of triangles and squares, and over time it decides on one shape to go with, or sorts the triangles and squares into their own sub-structures. And this tighter re-packing of molecules is what raises the melting point?

Idk, maybe I'm just trying to reconcile where DMT with melting points in the 60s are supposed to fit in his study.

Also, how is it re-ordering itself at all in solid state? Is the study implying that lower melting point polymorphs are glass / amorphous / slightly "liquid"? Is it always a one way transformation from lower to higher MP or could it move the other way?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom