The inherent contradiction is amply present in the ancient literature of many religions also. I like the question "What else could this entity do?", because such entities as those on record as having substantiated their own existence, are also known as the men who began the world's great religions. Obviously any religion can be perceived as flawed, and as having an inherent contradiction. Yet the contradictions usually relate, (oddly enough), to a confusion between how matters are defined at a higher level, and how the same matters are defined at a lower level, at which the matter is not exactly the same, because at the lower level particles are more dense and vibrations are less dense. As at the higher level, particles are less dense, with more space between particles, and more vibrations in each particle, and thus the vibrations are more dense. Wave and particle. We ought avoid confusing wave and particle, as the waveform and the particle moving in the waveform, are not the same. Now, in theory if we could avoid that confusion, religions have no inherent contradiction. Yet religions fail time and time again, and if you trust me and my point of view, you'd believe it only because of waveforms and particles being confused. In which perhaps it is more useful to look into how religions succeed. Obviously so, or none might exist. Religions are inherently a matter of Hope, and hope is the waveform. Faith is rather beyond religion's capacity to implant, and religions merely teach how to manage hope (waveform), such as that faith, which is the particles, can be sustained within the human body.
Loveall, I'd like to know how your trip comes down and integrates. I think often enough the particles teach us that we don't exist in reality, while the waveforms vibrated with a notion of existing, and thus we hope we exist.