sleepermustawaken said:
The danger of impurities is dramaticly minimal if you as you say do the clean up steps consciously and know for sure that you have clean dmt-fumarate.
Yet you didnt help us know that this is the case for you. All we see is that you ask questions which show you are not a chemist or an expert on it. Which is no problem per se, you dont have to be, but then dont be surprised if people react strongly when they see someone who might not have any clue what he is doing, talking about ingesting dmt in a potentially unsafe manner.
sleepermustawaken said:
For that matter though if you ate dmt-fumarate that supposedly contains any of those impurities in the list you mentioned you would have serious health issues and feel sick just the same as injecting.
You don't know that. We know for a fact that route of ingestion can greatly change the absorption and metabolism of different chemicals, why are you assuming that this isn't the case with impurities?
With the stomach you'd have a barrier before a substance is absorbed. The stomach would neutralize any base for example, wouldn't make it to the blood. Also people dissolve DMT in acidic solution before ingesting so excess base wouldnt be a problem. As for excess acid, well people are just dissolving in orange or lemon juice so that's not overly acidic, and the stomach/gastrointestinal tract is ready for such pH. On the other hand, I don't think it would be very safe to directly inject IV some excess base or excess acid, depending on amounts or the specific base or acid.
As for rust inhibitors or other potential additives, we'd have to look case by case to see what is the toxicity and metabolism like to know. But generally either way IVing substance, due to the fast onset and sharp peak, may be even more toxic than ingesting at the same dosage. And we also are very adamant about reminding people to be careful when ingesting substances in other ROA regarding such impurities, look at the FAQ and amount of threads on the subject
sleepermustawaken said:
Also injection times and hyperspace are off, especially with a tornique on during injection. Hyperspace comes well after injection from the reports I have read so it doesn't seem a worry, the worry is the shock of sudden onset and making an accident with needle which is still not much of a worry at all. It takes approx 5 seconds to inject and starts coming on in 3 seconds.
Whether it "seems" or "doesn't seem" a worry seems like a subjective decision you are taking. The point is not whether you are worried, but whether care is being taken eliminate those possibilities and whether you are expressing it in a clear way for the people in this community which are the people reading your posts.
Also you need to consider that every post is an 'example' to someone who may know less than you. Are you making sure these less informed people are getting the full information not to do something misinformed and dangerous themselves?
I still think that it's way safer at least for first times that one does with a sitter, to know how you react, how long it takes to hit, if you move around too much, if you can get dangerously close to the needle during the effects, etc..
sleepermustawaken said:
All I am saying is this excessive worry that I seem to see everyone have is unfounded with evidence and for those like me who don't like to smoke and like a shorter duration than aya or just like the clean feeling of pure dmt then this ROA is a valid option and shouldn't be shunned away by scared people who don't have health reports. I see their point of view, it may be risky if noobs try it out but most people who get to this situation who have usable dmt and are prepared to inject mostly know what the heck they are doing.
For the reasons stated earlier I do not think worry is unfounded neither excessive, but I do think people can express themselves in friendlier way regarding the subject.
Did you consider anal use? It's also shorter duration than oral and should be fine without harmalas, though I haven't tried myself.
I do think that any ROA is valid if the person is careful and informed and so on. But each ROA has it's own characteristics that must be considered and talk about, which is exactly what we're doing here.
As for "most people know what the heck they are doing", that is a big assumption, since you don't know many others in the same position, do you? What if most people don't know what the heck they are doing and to assume they do is to potentially lead them into accidents? What is the amount of work that needs to be done to express safety concerns and be clear on safety measures (and the possible advantages of doing that), versus the work saved by assuming they already know and not explaining (and the possible dangers) ? How much work does it take to argue about how one is right and it's all safe (and the benefits), and how much work would it be to take a look at the FAQ IV entry and help improving the IV safety guidelines or building more information on the subject in general?
Sunshine time, trees are calling me 8)