Hello!
Sorry to open another thread, but I found contradictory information.
If one wants to use Harmalas Sublingual, I was told that 30 mg is a good number.
But then someone told that 50 mg *even nearly feels like oral Harmala*.
I guess he means that it feels like the standard dose for full inhibition, meaning 200 mg Harmalas.
But I even WANT this full inhibition dose and therefore I search for the Sublingual dosage of this, which would be equivalent.
So does this mean that 30 mg alone will just be enough to get a worthy effect, but indeed NOT the full potential, compared to 200 mg Harmalas orally administrered?
And second Question:
Of course I would definetly say it's advised to use the HCl-Harmalas, as you want to get them into your system as fast as possible (or maybe freebase wont be absorbed at all, if not water soluble).
But I read somewhere that one told to use the Freebase.
So what is your own experience / argument?
THXXXXX
Sorry to open another thread, but I found contradictory information.
If one wants to use Harmalas Sublingual, I was told that 30 mg is a good number.
But then someone told that 50 mg *even nearly feels like oral Harmala*.
I guess he means that it feels like the standard dose for full inhibition, meaning 200 mg Harmalas.
But I even WANT this full inhibition dose and therefore I search for the Sublingual dosage of this, which would be equivalent.
So does this mean that 30 mg alone will just be enough to get a worthy effect, but indeed NOT the full potential, compared to 200 mg Harmalas orally administrered?
And second Question:
Of course I would definetly say it's advised to use the HCl-Harmalas, as you want to get them into your system as fast as possible (or maybe freebase wont be absorbed at all, if not water soluble).
But I read somewhere that one told to use the Freebase.
So what is your own experience / argument?
THXXXXX