I feel that 6 months is fine. It gives a better opportunity to market the event to new people. It's important that such an event feels big from the start.
True..I feel that 6 months is fine. It gives a better opportunity to market the event to new people. It's important that such an event feels big from the start.
obliguhl said:I feel that 6 months is fine. It gives a better opportunity to market the event to new people. It's important that such an event feels big from the start.
If nobody ''felt'' or ''saw'' each other ,then what's the use of these events.
tryptographer said:obliguhl said:I feel that 6 months is fine. It gives a better opportunity to market the event to new people. It's important that such an event feels big from the start.
My first thought: once every new season (every 3 months); twice a year somehow seems not enough.
Neo Guado said:Aren't we jumping the gun here?
We dont even know if it produced some actual results yet.
If nobody ''felt'' or ''saw'' each other ,then what's the use of these events.
timeloop said:tryptographer said:obliguhl said:I feel that 6 months is fine. It gives a better opportunity to market the event to new people. It's important that such an event feels big from the start.
My first thought: once every new season (every 3 months); twice a year somehow seems not enough.
I like the 3 month concept. It would be great to do it on both the equinox and solstice (s)
any eager participants want to join me on a montly full moon synchronization?
If nobody ''felt'' or ''saw'' each other ,then what's the use of these events.
I think the 3 month idea is a good one. 2x a year is a bit spread out and people may just forget about it.
acolon_5 said:Besides, I just like the idea of people all over the world launching at the same time.
acolon_5 said:timeloop said:tryptographer said:obliguhl said:I feel that 6 months is fine. It gives a better opportunity to market the event to new people. It's important that such an event feels big from the start.
My first thought: once every new season (every 3 months); twice a year somehow seems not enough.
I like the 3 month concept. It would be great to do it on both the equinox and solstice (s)
any eager participants want to join me on a montly full moon synchronization?
I think the 3 month idea is a good one. 2x a year is a bit spread out and people may just forget about it.
If nobody ''felt'' or ''saw'' each other ,then what's the use of these events.
Every experiment must be repeated at least once. Success or failure the first time does not prove anyhting. The experiement must be repeatable! Besides, I just like the idea of people all over the world launching at the same time.
on the other hand: some considerations suggest, to fix the next event on the 30 september, because that day the lhc in geneva will be started...to explain, why, would be impossible for me even in my native language......
Right On!!Seriously, this is what I like the most about this event. The idea that we have come together as a community, even though spread out across the world, to blast off together in spirit is just awesome. It's like celebrating our freedom together in a mental party.Besides, I just like the idea of people all over the world launching at the same time.
It wasn't until I was writing up my report at the S.H.E. site that even noticed how some of the events in my experience might just have had some connection to the others participating!!Every experiment must be repeated at least once. Success or failure the first time does not prove anyhting. The experiement must be repeatable!If nobody ''felt'' or ''saw'' each other ,then what's the use of these events.
hi, "sally-fan" ! i am glad to meet you here too! its amazing: the www is a global village.Hi to the guy who turned me to McKenna and DMT ...but pssssst.
Nice to have you at the nexus.
"oblighul" sounds a little bit scary..
These are cool, but we REALLY need people to do this at the same time on Dec 21, 2012. I want to have a 2012 "party"