Would it be worth trying to just use the word:
NEXUS
?
I don't know how these things work really.
Could using NEXUS as our common point of reference work? Like a HyperNoun.
By associating it with this site and not it's general definition, by whatever images or feelings we relate it to here with, we could avoid each individual voyager from creating a subjectively distinct image space where they expect others to come to - as the phrase, "meet me at the antique looking inn in France," might lead to some some confusion.
Images are ... a little strange for me with hyperspace, but maybe a single word could be closest to intersubjectivity. I mean, this is one term we all have in common that is exclusive of everyone else - "we" who are on this site as opposed to other spicers or monks, who are unaware of its existence etc.
Whether it be focusing on the logo at the top of each page or a sense of various posts that tie us experientially with this site or our views of the makeup of various members, just any and all personal relation resonating from the common point of NEXUS, we meet at that one seed. In the best case scenario, each individual could train their mind beforehand to think NEXUS and have it expand to or call up on the spatial definition, so when the S.H.E. occurs we all launch with a smile and NEXUS in mind. If there's any moments of thought in hyperspace, try to have them revolve around NEXUS to create convergence/construction with all involved.
Be totally focused on only connection and leave communication and identification to further down the path. Maybe the successful experience would have a shared instance of encountering many entities, or even just any form of shared instance would be a good start. So as it's probably been stated in these twenty pages, use a method that's familiar and if non-launches are common try a tiny bit of extra spice.
One step at a time, the first is into the NEXUS.
What do you think? Worth a launch?
When the Equinox comes, I'll see you at the NEXUS?