GeospatialThinking
Ex Bioinspired and muladharma temporary account
First context: I have had the (some would say) unique chance of having tried the classical psychedelics and other classes of medicines in my life, that aren't necessarily psychoactive in the pure sense, like antipsychotics, delirants, and onwards.
Therefore I have a better appreciation for how unique people's biologies can be, sometimes expressing emotions or qualia that are often chemically induced by those agents simply by having inherited other traits, while otherwise it makes me question if people's atypic behaviour is caused by a certain class of substances that they might be secretly taking as a hobby, thinking it improves their quality of experiencing life by some measure.
Having spent time on the DMT-Nexus chat but also in my ever-evolving view of what behavioural projections arise from people's internal subjective experience, I gained a sense of assessing people's interactions by not only their philosophy, moods, etc... but also their pharmacology. It might not be a far off deduction using simple language that people on different substances interact (or don't) differently. (e.g. people experiencing irritability might be less aggreable?)
Secondly, if there were large groups of people with such habits (pathologies), it makes me wonder how it would affect society! Surely normal people in the search of spiritual growth and personal virtues will tend to gravitate away from self-reinforcing vicious cycles of substance (mis)experimentation.
How are such people kept isolated so as to not interfere (even economically) with peaceful, sensible agents? If your worldview is that they take care of themselves, my question becomes: couldn't it be possible that if enough of them live together, it becomes a sort of "way of life", giving rise to whole societies, organized groups, so on... taking the shape of whatever ideological label containing the word "narc" one might place on it?
So there goes the hypothesis. My conclusion and possible request for feedback from the community might be proposed to be situated on the lines of: how hard is it to be aware of such issues for people who have experienced and noticed them? what is their attitude towards them (protective, helpful)? for people with experience in trip-sitting, is it hard to learn how users of different substances interact, and do these skills make you think about society when you are not at a festival?
Therefore I have a better appreciation for how unique people's biologies can be, sometimes expressing emotions or qualia that are often chemically induced by those agents simply by having inherited other traits, while otherwise it makes me question if people's atypic behaviour is caused by a certain class of substances that they might be secretly taking as a hobby, thinking it improves their quality of experiencing life by some measure.
Having spent time on the DMT-Nexus chat but also in my ever-evolving view of what behavioural projections arise from people's internal subjective experience, I gained a sense of assessing people's interactions by not only their philosophy, moods, etc... but also their pharmacology. It might not be a far off deduction using simple language that people on different substances interact (or don't) differently. (e.g. people experiencing irritability might be less aggreable?)
Secondly, if there were large groups of people with such habits (pathologies), it makes me wonder how it would affect society! Surely normal people in the search of spiritual growth and personal virtues will tend to gravitate away from self-reinforcing vicious cycles of substance (mis)experimentation.
How are such people kept isolated so as to not interfere (even economically) with peaceful, sensible agents? If your worldview is that they take care of themselves, my question becomes: couldn't it be possible that if enough of them live together, it becomes a sort of "way of life", giving rise to whole societies, organized groups, so on... taking the shape of whatever ideological label containing the word "narc" one might place on it?
So there goes the hypothesis. My conclusion and possible request for feedback from the community might be proposed to be situated on the lines of: how hard is it to be aware of such issues for people who have experienced and noticed them? what is their attitude towards them (protective, helpful)? for people with experience in trip-sitting, is it hard to learn how users of different substances interact, and do these skills make you think about society when you are not at a festival?