• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

What is the best yielding MHRB tek

Migrated topic.

infinitynlove

Mushroom Explorer
Merits
42
What is the best yielding MHRB tek?

NOTE this is for 200 grams of MHRB and is for personal use only!

SWIM would love white crystals, but SWIM doesn't mind if it is mixed with DMT oxide and the final product is oily, last time SWIM performed an extraction, she used the tek in the dmt handbook, but her yields where about 0.4% of MHRB weight, which does not seem to high!

Can anyone give pointers to the best MHRB tek for yield.

SWIM has the following chems

Naphtha
Acetone
IPA
Zinc metal powder
LYE
Sulfuric and phosphoric acid

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
 
infinitynlove said:
last time SWIM performed an extraction, she used the tek in the dmt handbook, but her yields where about 0.4% of MHRB weight, which does not seem to high!

Do not forget that is your MHRB contains only 0.4% of DMT that it does not matter what tek you gonna use. Just saying cos this can happen.

My personal recommendation would be q21q21 the second tek. Check it out here
 
any uptdate? regarding all the teks available, whitch one yields the best of virtually pure dmt? i'm not speaking of jungle spice or jim jam..just white crystals. i've had good results with the vovin tek in the past. :)
 
you want to maximize yield. aromatic hydrocarbon solvents are practically a must.

you can do initial pulls with naphtha, then pull the remaining goodies with limonene or toluene or xylene or whatever.

or you can just do initial pulls with an aromatic, and purify the spice with an aliphatic (naphtha or what-have-you).

OR you can leave as is, and just smoke the goop pulled from the aromatic
 
I would like to discourage the use of aromatic solvents like xylene and toluene due to the fact that they are highly carcinogenic. They can be used safely but there are a few things to remember when using them. They have a very low vapor pressure which means that they evaporate very slowly. You may have to let the crystal dry for weeks to ensure the solvent is actually completely gone. You can hasten the process if you have a vacuum oven, but that is something I doubt many people have access to. Another thing to remember is that these solvents will not allow for a freeze precipitation so waiting for the solvent to evaporate is unavoidable. Also, these solvents pull a very broad spectrum of alkaloids and some of those may not be separated from the spice using any of the methods we discuss on this forum. The plant sources of DMT contain many other tryptamines that are extremely similar to it. These have properties which we normally utilize to separate the spice from the impurities that come out in our pulls using aliphatic solvents. I won't say not to use them because it is ultimately up to the person doing the extraction that has to decide, but I would avoid them and find that they are unnecessary for achieving maximum yields and pose too much of a health risk to make them worth using. That being said, they do pull everything out of the mimosa wine. Not much gets left behind. The only problem with that is whether you really need everything that they pull.
 
I'd like to mention that the use of xylene, etc doesn't necessarily require an evaporation - you can add fumaric-acid-saturated acetone to the xylene pulls to precipitate DMT fumarate, then pour off the excess xylene and let the fumarates dry.

In my extractions, I like to do at least 3 pulls with naphtha, then switch to xylene for the remaining few pulls which I FASA and then re-base and pull with naphtha.
 
Good call arcologist, As long as you make an aqueous solution of your fumarate salt and then recover with an aliphatic solvent after converting to the freebase you should end up with none of the aromatic solvent in your final product. You only have to worry about the solvent you breath in while your working with it. I personally try to avoid this but the PEL is high enough that it can be used safely in an extraction. There are ways around the evaporation that I failed to think of. I guess I just have too strong a bias against these solvents. Good call though.
 
Back
Top Bottom