SWIM has experienced nothing but boring results from bufotenin. The material is pure according to HPLC and GC analysis (the only impurity is a trace amount of dmt). The material has been ingested with dmt, alcohol, harmaloids. These combinations tend to result in a decrease of side effects (the constrictive feeling one gets after initial inhalation) but not much else. The material was been consumed in upwards of 20-30mg range via inhalation.
So what is up with bufotenine? Some users report excellent results other consistently report headaches stomachaches and little to no visual activity.
We've been speculating for some time now that these differences may be the result of different seed batches containing different levels of bufotenine n oxide. But is this truly the case? If so how can we prove or disprove it?
Some members have been investigating zinc reduction of crude material. How has this faired?
So far SWIM has searched via LC-MS, HPLC, and GC-MS to try and observe the n oxide but has so far failed to see any evidence. GC it won't be observable because of thermal degradation but then how likely is it that the compound survives heating when one smokes it? Maybe heating seeds is destroying the n oxide and thats why most extraction teks have a heating step? Using LC-MS one should see the buf + Oxygen peak but again perhaps its degraded? SWIM wants to imagine more experiments like this but that will have to wait. HPLC with UV detection only reveals one compound but perhaps they are overlapping and need to be resolved better? Although the peak looks pure. Would n oxides change UV properties of a parent alkaloid?
Perhaps a simple method such as TLC can resolve these two compounds?
SWIM can't find any old literature on the presence of n oxides and its starting to make SWIM skeptical that they even exist in these seeds. Maybe bufotenine is just a shitty drug for some people and a good drug for others?
The only way SWIM can think of to really make the chromatography trust worthy is to prepare bufotenine n oxide from the parent alkaloid. How can one go about doing this? Throw it in some peroxide? Any ideas?
So what is up with bufotenine? Some users report excellent results other consistently report headaches stomachaches and little to no visual activity.
We've been speculating for some time now that these differences may be the result of different seed batches containing different levels of bufotenine n oxide. But is this truly the case? If so how can we prove or disprove it?
Some members have been investigating zinc reduction of crude material. How has this faired?
So far SWIM has searched via LC-MS, HPLC, and GC-MS to try and observe the n oxide but has so far failed to see any evidence. GC it won't be observable because of thermal degradation but then how likely is it that the compound survives heating when one smokes it? Maybe heating seeds is destroying the n oxide and thats why most extraction teks have a heating step? Using LC-MS one should see the buf + Oxygen peak but again perhaps its degraded? SWIM wants to imagine more experiments like this but that will have to wait. HPLC with UV detection only reveals one compound but perhaps they are overlapping and need to be resolved better? Although the peak looks pure. Would n oxides change UV properties of a parent alkaloid?
Perhaps a simple method such as TLC can resolve these two compounds?
SWIM can't find any old literature on the presence of n oxides and its starting to make SWIM skeptical that they even exist in these seeds. Maybe bufotenine is just a shitty drug for some people and a good drug for others?
The only way SWIM can think of to really make the chromatography trust worthy is to prepare bufotenine n oxide from the parent alkaloid. How can one go about doing this? Throw it in some peroxide? Any ideas?

