ACRB yield exactly the same as MHRB, Same Tek

[Mondu.the.Fat]

This will be my last post here, I have not enjoyed this forum as much as I thought I would, nothing personal, I just kind of don't get it. Even though I've been involved with hyperspace travel for 5 years, I enjoyed this board much more when I was a guest. Here are some reasons why:

I don't think there need be more than 1 tek, unless you can find one that's completely food safe, which I have not found. People call teks "food safe," but I wouldn't eat them.

David Barrows and Be Love have videos on how to do this, it's basic as basic can get.

ACRB and MHRB did not need a stitch of difference to yield, same process.

Every yield that I've read about is less than using the the Barrow's tek.

30 little grams yields more than one needs for a while, honestly, and one only need only find 1/8 of a kilo to achieve 3 pulls each 4 times, and if one doesn't pull perfectly after watching the video, then you... didn't watch the video right.

I kinda am now wondering why I thought there was a lot to discuss, not to diss anyone, but I just watched a 14 year old on Chopped on Food Network absolutely BF a lamb chop with an herb crust that a 50 year old expert chef almost nutted over.

This was about 1/15th as difficult.

IMO, it's not magic, it's just a parlor trick with your visual cortex. Your brain is smart, it knows how to find patterns in math. It can make your weird non-thoughts look like self-transforming ninja light beings. Is that reality? Who cares. I haven't really met many humans in my several dozen trips around the sun who really can even start to discuss reality without getting hyphy.

I'm getting married and find that that love affair is a trip beyond any trip I've ever created for myself, and suddenly, as I blasted my wife-to-be off, I was like, "Man, what a trooper. She's never so much as hit a spliff, and here she is allowing me to put a C pipe in her mouth and explain that I'm going to torch it, breathe in, hold it, and you'll be in God's Leggo board."

She did it, I did it, we were in a space ship, yay.

Now we're gonna get married like... 8 days from now.

I did an ACRB pull this morning and realized that I used to be into MAPPS and stuff. Now I'm, like, pouring solvents on red dyes to try and keep up with what I wanted when I was 28?

Ugh.


Anyways, ACRB/MHRB - literally zero difference.

30G bark
300 ml distilled water
6 grams lye

solvent

warm, stir, warm, stir, warm, stir

do it in your sink filled with warm water.

pull of the cloudy layer, put in in a tray, put it in a freezer.

Done.

FLUFFY. WHITE. HUGE. ICEBERG LOOKING. XTLZ.

 

[SnozzleBerry]

People call teks "food safe," but I wouldn't eat them.

:roll:

So you don't understand the definition of "Food Safe"

*A note on “food safe” solvents and bases: The labels “food safe” or “food grade” do not mean that a given product is safe for human consumption. They only mean that the substance in question “meets the minimum standard for substances permitted to be in contact with food.” This means that regardless of the purity of such products, they are neither toxic nor carcinogenic beyond the levels set forth in food safety standards. This is very important to note in the case of caustic substances, such as food grade sodium hydroxide or calcium hydroxide, which are every bit as strong as their non-food grade counterparts.

David Barrows and Be Love have videos on how to do this, it's basic as basic can get.

I don't know who David Barrows is, but Brian Love has produced some of the worst videos on DMT extraction I have seen, from both informational and safety perspectives.

Every yield that I've read about is less than using the the Barrow's tek.

You can't yield more than is in the material you use. As we have people top 2% from M. tenuiflora (some quite regularly) I find this claim rather tenuous.

30 little grams yields more than one needs for a while, honestly, and one only need only find 1/8 of a kilo to achieve 3 pulls each 4 times, and if one doesn't pull perfectly after watching the video, then you... didn't watch the video right.

You can't really speak to how much anyone other than yourself needs. I have been present at changa sessions where an ounce of changa was smoked by a number of experienced travelers over the course of an evening. That alone would require significantly more starting material than you are talking about. Additionally, plant material varies in its alkaloids content, so claims like this are rather nonsensical.

I kinda am now wondering why I thought there was a lot to discuss, not to diss anyone, but I just watched a 14 year old on Chopped on Food Network absolutely BF a lamb chop with an herb crust that a 50 year old expert chef almost nutted over.

This was about 1/15th as difficult.

As Uncle Knucles says, "If you can bake a cake, you can bake a noodle." Extraction is likely the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what there is to discuss. The experiences themselves, as well as the ontological/existential questions are the real meat and potatoes of this whole arena, imo.

IMO, it's not magic, it's just a parlor trick with your visual cortex. Your brain is smart, it knows how to find patterns in math. It can make your weird non-thoughts look like self-transforming ninja light beings. Is that reality? Who cares.

And while you're certainly entitled to your opinion, it hardly has a bearing on anyone else's, or the reality of the sitaution, whatever that may be.

Anyways, ACRB/MHRB - literally zero difference.

Except there is...and we have the analytical data to back that up.

I have to be honest, I don't really understand the point of this post. Why are you so bitter?

 

[Felnik]

I'm not getting this either. Who cares if there are different teks anyway. whats the real issue here ?

 

[yamma1]

There is so much more to this forum than extraction teks.

The knowledge here is outstanding, from safety to full blown chemistry and more.

You said you enjoyed this board much more when you was a guest. More than when you joined and could join in? Doesn't say much for your own contribution to the forum!

Anyway, congrats on your marriage. Good luck in the future.

Ps, David Barlow has an extraction tek

 

[Adjhart]

Good luck to you, OP, in your future endeavors.

 

[Mondu.the.Fat]

Good luck to you, OP, in your future endeavors.

Thank you, I appreciate you reading my thoughts and responding in a way which feels supportive, I wish you the best also.

re: all that other stuff -

I felt as though I was pretty clear about where I was at, and I left what I have found to be the easiest, most successful way that one might do the thing, which, last I checked, was supposed to be how the sharing of data would work, here.

I came, and learned and shared, and some people aren't meant for some boards, if my attitude isn't cut out for this, then it's my issue, not the board's. I like to express myself in a certain way, and it is really abrasive. The internet makes it difficult for one to understand what another person is saying with any nuance. You know this. I know this.

My issue becomes, if I were to actualize my optimum trajectory, I would fit into schema that weren't familiar to me. However, I tend to optimize defensiveness and dissociation as my stratagem for upward progression, instead of setting a baseline, saving the power of myself, and trying my best to work with the other person.

I think this is a lesson, in that I came to this thread to express myself and my experience, and albeit a bit obnoxious, it was just a stream of conscious in the moment that was occurring for me right then.

If I had stated that I was trying to exit, and it wasn't working out for me, the fact that negativity befell me from a member who has been a whole lot, when I was in the only part of the forum I can post in (which has added to my frustration - reinforcing that I am not right for the board, and that policy is great. It weeds people like me out.

The thing is, on a board that is set up for me to join in with discussion about something that is already somewhat socially anxiety provoking, for me to be 100% real, and to be called bitter, reinforces that I am not ion the right place.

So, I guess, my last point is, why would you kick someone in the ass on the way out, that seems like a bad look, you know? But, being butt-hurt about it, that's crazy, because here I am, taking time out of my day to argue with a figment of my imagination on the internet.

It's all love.

So Long!

And Thank You!
-all the fish

 

[SnozzleBerry]

So, I guess, my last point is, why would you kick someone in the ass on the way out, that seems like a bad look, you know?

I assume this is directed at me?

I didn't kick you in the ass...or at least, that wasn't my intention. You made a number of claims that are incorrect, afaik. I merely rebutted those claims. I'm sorry if that hurt your feelings, but I'm not sorry for attempting to quash the spread of misinformation.

Be well :thumb_up:

 

[AcaciaConfusedYah]

Dmt seems to have a high turn-over rate for users - many leave as Quickly as they came. Nothing wrong with that.

I like multiple teks. Gives me options.... Also, there will always be new research and means of extraction. That's a good thing, IMO.

I would be pissed if the only religion to choose from was Christianity. No thanks, pass.


It's completely fine to come to terms that you don't need Dmt.

Congrats on the marriage!