Viperoid said:
Cygnus , in which country do you live ?
I am terrified to hear that and now feeling paranoia because all my glassware is also stays wehere everyone can see in the home.
Bu the idea that will arrest you is little bit bugging me i mean in the end the thing that you do is some little experiment extraction of leaves , roots etc. How they can prove it ?
Or is it also illegal to making experiments at home where you live ? Can anyone please lighten me a little bit ?
I live where DMT and other N-substituted indoles (5MEO, 5OH, Moxy, etc.) are Schedule I controlled substances.
Me, I'm a guy who keeps an ultra low profile, despite being on probation. My problem is, I have an ex-friend who thinks I'm a sociopath (aren't we all, a little?) and an ex step-dad who actually IS a sociopath and a child molester who are both working in tandem to do everything in their power to make sure I spend a lot of time in jail/prison.
I tried telling the lovely inquisitors that I was working on extracting harmaline which is not scheduled, and not part of the analog act, either; also that I was an engineering student with a niche interest in organic chemistry and physics, hence all the glassware.
The Analog act is a tricky little devil, as it basically covers more molecules than most drug agents are even aware of.
It is not, in my jurisdiction explicitly illegal to own glassware, but it can constitute as paraphernalia in the right context (i.e. in tandem with other substances used in manufacturing).
The point to all of this is that drug laws, particularly where manufacturing is concerned is both:
a) Tricky, convoluted, and usually easy to undermine, and;
b) Mainly focused on cannabis and "hard drugs" with a special preference in prosecuting amphetamine manufacturing, particularly in homes with children, pregnant women, and those near school zones.
It's also really difficult to make a case without the presence of any quantity (which thankfully I did not possess) of the illicit substance. Presumably, there could still be some in the residue on the jars they seized, but I sharply doubt it.
Outcry against DMT is mostly unheard-of. Even most of the agents were ignorant of what DMT actually was, as well as DXM (dextromethorphan).
DXM, as a side note is a Schedule II controled substance (also an opiate analog) in my jurisdiction (as the nice agents were so kind to inform me), and possession of the pure form is a class 4 felony, with sale and distribution as a class 2.
tl;dr, as I do more and more research the more and more I find that prosecuting against an inactive DMT lab would prove to be laborious and difficult, and easy to undermine.