I've been interested in the causation behind DMT amnesia and how it can help explain the experience itself, and tried looking to dreams for some help. Now dream amnesia, although far more investigated, doesn't have any concrete explanation either - as is the case with most things regarding the brain. However, there is one working theory related to norepinephrine during REM sleep that I think could help in explaining DMT amnesia. Norepinephrine, among other neurotransmitters, contributes to memory formation and condensation, yet it's almost completely inactive during sleep, especially REM sleep, which is when dreams are at their peak - basically meaning that the low levels of norepinephrine stops the brain from creating memories of much of our dream experiences. This association is the strongest neurological argument as to why we forget our dreams, so I wondered if there was any parallel between the neurotransmitter and the DMT experience.
I couldn't find any research regarding norepinephrine levels during or after the DMT experience. Does anybody have any knowledge of this? If norepinephrine levels also drop or are inhibited after DMT administration, then we could probably conclude that similar to a dream, the DMT experience is largely forgotten because our brain is simply less capable of creating memories at all. However, if norepinephrine levels remain constant throughout and subsequent to DMT administration, then this would imply that there is a causation separate from that of dream amnesia in the case of DMT. This, I believe, is the more fascinating potential answer, because it would most likely mean that the brain is capable of creating long-term memories under the influence DMT, but far less capable of retrieving the memories after the experience.
This could possibly mean that substantial memories are still contained in the brain after the DMT experience, but are unable to be re-experienced (like trying to put a Blu-Ray disc into a VHS player), or the encoded information of the experience is simply incapable of existing in the brain without the presence of DMT. The feeling of 'remembering' the DMT-space and all your past experiences with the substance are very commonly reported, and this could possibly be due to the idea that DMT is needed to re-access these contained memories rather than the idea that the memories largely fade post-trip.
For anybody with any computer experience at all, this could be compared to, say, a .RAR file. Your computer, in it's 'sober' state, is incapable of accessing the contents of a .RAR file. It can download it, it can store it, but it can't extract the information - that is, unless you have a program like WinRAR which could open it for you (WinRAR in this example being DMT). When you download WinRAR onto your computer and it is integrated into the system, the contents of the .RAR file are now available to you. Then, ten or fifteen minutes later, you remove WinRAR from your computer, and .RAR files are now, once again, unavailable to you. It seems like common sense really, but if this is the case, the question is what is that content from the DMT experience that the brain is incapable of extracting in the sober state?
However, this is a question I don't think should be pursued until we actually know it's the case, which is why I ask if anybody has that info on norepinephrine activity. There are endless interesting questions to explore, but until we rule out what isn't the case, everything else is pure theory, so evidence of substance needs to be found if we want to get any closer to understanding the fascinating substance itself.
Thoughts?
I couldn't find any research regarding norepinephrine levels during or after the DMT experience. Does anybody have any knowledge of this? If norepinephrine levels also drop or are inhibited after DMT administration, then we could probably conclude that similar to a dream, the DMT experience is largely forgotten because our brain is simply less capable of creating memories at all. However, if norepinephrine levels remain constant throughout and subsequent to DMT administration, then this would imply that there is a causation separate from that of dream amnesia in the case of DMT. This, I believe, is the more fascinating potential answer, because it would most likely mean that the brain is capable of creating long-term memories under the influence DMT, but far less capable of retrieving the memories after the experience.
This could possibly mean that substantial memories are still contained in the brain after the DMT experience, but are unable to be re-experienced (like trying to put a Blu-Ray disc into a VHS player), or the encoded information of the experience is simply incapable of existing in the brain without the presence of DMT. The feeling of 'remembering' the DMT-space and all your past experiences with the substance are very commonly reported, and this could possibly be due to the idea that DMT is needed to re-access these contained memories rather than the idea that the memories largely fade post-trip.
For anybody with any computer experience at all, this could be compared to, say, a .RAR file. Your computer, in it's 'sober' state, is incapable of accessing the contents of a .RAR file. It can download it, it can store it, but it can't extract the information - that is, unless you have a program like WinRAR which could open it for you (WinRAR in this example being DMT). When you download WinRAR onto your computer and it is integrated into the system, the contents of the .RAR file are now available to you. Then, ten or fifteen minutes later, you remove WinRAR from your computer, and .RAR files are now, once again, unavailable to you. It seems like common sense really, but if this is the case, the question is what is that content from the DMT experience that the brain is incapable of extracting in the sober state?
However, this is a question I don't think should be pursued until we actually know it's the case, which is why I ask if anybody has that info on norepinephrine activity. There are endless interesting questions to explore, but until we rule out what isn't the case, everything else is pure theory, so evidence of substance needs to be found if we want to get any closer to understanding the fascinating substance itself.
Thoughts?
Last edited: