Kyngwhatt said:interesting what do you mean putting your own slant on it like making a brand and capitalizing on it?
PedroSanchez said:i have not seen that place before. having a quick glance around it looks like they have more on their mind than creating a safe place for psychonaughts to gather. i have seen that format 100 times before and it is almost always a farm, looking for data, money, info, etc (most can be deduced to money).
im not saying they cant be trusted, im just saying that i dont trust them. they could be completely honest people with completely honest, empathetic intentions, but only time will really tell.
i will be checking it out a little now to see what they are all about, but i cant see them offering much that isnt already out there in places like the nexus.
while digging up information i am seeing potential links to google, facebook and patreon. i dont know of any wrongdoings by patreon yet, but the company seems to be making the same steps as companies like facebook and google do in their seedling stage.
personally i would stick with places like this that are mostly community driven and have a solid record.
i really hope i am wrong though. i will report back if anything stands out.
tatt said:Yeah there's some questionable things about that site when you start looking through everything there and how it's set up. Some things you sort've have to ask yourself. We had another thread last year on here talking about that site when it popped up.
Agree with pretty much what everyone said here though.
... these chickens jacking our style. SnozzleBerry said:The site creators got in contact with me at one point and we had a direct exchange.
It did not go well :thumb_dow
Don't even get me started on [[redacted]](i feel like i just escaped jonestown or something) everyone there is clamming like 2.5 % to 4.0+ yield when they use [[redacted]]. i contacted them before they shut down for "security reasons" and they said they somehow remove the fiber from the bark after they grind it so its basically got double the magic in it????tatt said:Here's one thing that I'd thought was pretty hilarious.
:lol:
jma182 said:Unfortunately, there is no way to get around this based on how our system operates and how typical websites operate.
The Traveler said:I would not even exclude malicious intent from the looks of it.