• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Does this ring true ...

Migrated topic.

Earthwalker

Rising Star
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
921
Merits
42
I gave some bark to someone last week and i know its inner root bark but he begins to differ and this was the conversation ....
But I want to know is what he says about the sap fat gums correct , as I though inner bark was root bark with the dead outter tissue removed ....


Person no1
can you explain how inner root bark has so much gak/gum in it. It is not even close to a quality product if it was it would not have any gums/sap which is from outer bark there are reasons why you get inner bark . this is by far the worst confusa ive had and ive never had any problem before with gak/gum. if I knew it wasn't inner root bark I would have used a different process and would not have been a problem the whole lot is now like golden syrup not happy a complete waste of time

Person no2 ( me )
I'm sorry it didn't reach you're expectations , but I guess you can't please everyone ....
Also I'm not going to argue but it is 100% inner root bark and I think you're getting Hawaiian confusa to Taiwanese !


Person no1
I am not sure u understand the role of fats/gums in a trees bark I am very experienced in this field and would have defatted if I had outer bark. the role of the sap/fats/gum is to protect the inner bark which carries water/nutrient to the tree. the outer carries 0 water/nutrient and has the sap/gum to keep pests away also for a band aid when damaged and also a couple other roles such as keeping the inner water/nutrient at temp that the tree can process. You really should know your barks and inner bark does not require any acid, cleaning of gums just water and a strong base. I was suspect when first seen it and should have defatted but the reason ppl like inner is to save time & solvent and excess fumes which is the reason I only ever use inner bark. the yield /quality doesn't change between either product just process. I am not trying to have a go at you just educate you as the product is probably a superior outer bark I have been able to recover a small amount but would have lost at least 90% cleaning it up eg yield less than 1g which usual yield from 1kg is between 16 - 20 of pure clear glass and less than 5% evap of solvent
most people would never know the difference if they follow the a/b extraction methods on the net but if they work out how to extract without evap of huge amounts of solvent and use a certain solvent which results in perfect huge crystals every time. only reason I know is by a lack of napatha or sheltie when doing this years ago there is nothing on the internet I have found that backs what I am saying just trial and error learning [ used for other recrystalisation of something else though] you could figure it out if you think about growing crystals
 
Looks like you have an angry customer...

Is he saying he got a 1g yield from 1kg of bark? :?
Is he saying defatting would have made him lose 90% of the yield? :?:
My deciphering skills aren't any good, I'm afraid...:oops:
 
DiMoiTou said:
Looks like you have an angry customer...

Is he saying he got a 1g yield from 1kg of bark? :?
Is he saying defatting would have made him lose 90% of the yield? :?:
My deciphering skills aren't any good, I'm afraid...:oops:

Not a customer as I don't source or talk of supplying or procuring of anything that can be classed illegal

Also I don't think it's that confusa ( hahaha ) to work out what he's saying , so maybe just read it again IDK ....
 
:?: have you gotten good yeilds from the same rootbark EW?

I almost want to say he's screwed up his extraction somehow & is attempting to blame it on the bark if thats the case.

Even in the event there was outer bark, & this may be a bit different for acacias, but i've always powdered mhrb with the thin, rough, outer layer intact & never run into problems with gums/goop in my product & if outer bark serves the function he's explaining, it should have the same effect regardless of source.

Do you know for sure this guy has previous experience extracting & isn't just a noob trying to look as if he knows his stuff because he thinks he got given crap material due to a botched extraction?
 
"if I knew it wasn't inner root bark I would have used a different process and would not have been a problem the whole lot is now like golden syrup not happy a complete waste of time"

newb extractor :)
 
jamie said:
"if I knew it wasn't inner root bark I would have used a different process and would not have been a problem the whole lot is now like golden syrup not happy a complete waste of time"

newb extractor :)

^ note he mentions not having to evap huge amounts of solvent from an extraction on a whole kilo :lol:
Might be credible if he mentioned salting out but i dont think he knows thats an option :lol:

Also note how he apparently would have lose 90% of 20g in the cleanup process :lol:
 
Hehe yes concombres its a complete farce , look I've used the same bark over a long period and I don't have a problem at all , infant I no a person that does a stb and pulls nice chunks of white & also 90% in the clean up is a joke in itself ... Thanks for the feedback fellas :thumb_up:
 
Back
Top Bottom