Barnacle
Rising Star
When performing an A/B SWIM made a minor error that led to some unexpected chemical phenomena. SWIM is trying to figure out what happened and would appreciate some help from the gurus here!
Here is the procedure SWIM followed:
- loaded 100 mg powdered MHRB into 6 paper tea bags
- twice boiled the bagged MHRB in 1.8L of vinegar solution (approxmiately pH=3, 125 mL 5% vinegar, 1675 mL tap water) for 1 hour at high pressure pressure directly in the stainless steel vessel of a pressure cooker (Instant Pot, 12 psi). Combined the resulting solutions to a combined 3.6 L (crude acidic extract)
- removed the tea bags; two of them had burst and significant sediment had leaked into solution, so SWIM let the crude acidic extract settle for several hours and decanted (decanted acidic extract), leaving a sludge at the bottom; however, lots of sediment remained suspended in solution
- vacuum-filtered the decanted acidic extract through a Buchner funnel with 20-micron pore filter papers (filtered acidic extract). Had to replace paper multiple times due to clogging; however, fine sediment still remained.
- reduced the 3.6 L filtered acidic extract to ~200 mL by boiling (acidic concentrate)
- vacuum-filtered the acidic concentrate through a celite pad to remove fine particles-- even this didn't seem to get all the sediment (filtered acidic concentrate)
- further reduced the filtered acidic concentrate to 150 mL by boiling
- defatted the room-temperature filtered acidic concentrate with ~100 mL of naphtha (defatted acidic concentrate). The naphtha used was clear but had been used on 2 previous extractions in a similar manner (defatting an acidic concentrate)
- mixed another 100 mL clean naphtha into the defatted acidic concentrate for extraction. Shook up separatory funnel to mix the phases. While separation was occurring, realized I had forgotten to basify the solution. Added 8 g crystal lye (calculated to achieve a pH of 12.5) into funnel and stirred. Lye dissolved but phases did not separate (emulsified basic concentrate).
So you can see SWIM's error was forgetting to add lye before performing the extraction. What confuses SWIM is that the extraction naphtha and basic concentrate did not separate when SWIM remembered to add lye. The emulsified basic concentrate was a dark purple-black, and didn't look like the emulsions SWIM has previously encountered. There was no layer separation at all, no bubbles-- just a thick uniform solution.
SWIM tried breaking the emulsion in various ways. In order:
- Heated solution-- this led to what SWIM assumed to be naphtha boiling off (temp stabilized at around 90C while some boiling was occurring), but did not lead to any layer separation.
- Added lots of sea salt (50 g?) to solution. It all dissolved but no layer separation.
- Added an additional 300 mL water. No separation.
- Added an additional 16 g lye. No separation.
- Finally, added an additional 100 mL fresh naphtha. Mixed the naphtha into solution with a magnetic stirrer. This naphtha then reseparated and seemed to take some of the emulsified naphtha with it-- an approximately 130 mL naphtha layer formed.
The formed naphtha layer was darker than any naphtha layer SWIM has seen before in an extraction. It was even kind of purplish, which SWIM has never seen (all the purple tends to remain in the aqueous layer).
SWIM washed this naphtha extract with 75 mL 10% sodium carbonate solution, which removed a fair amount of the coloring but not all of it. SWIM freeze precipitated it and got a mixture of nice white DMT crystals, crystals with purple impurities, and puddles of purplish resin. Note that the purplish impurities were *not* from solid plant material-- there were no visible solids in SWIM's extract.
SWIM is trying to figure out (a) what happened chemically; (b) what the best way is to clean the purple impurities from SWIM's precipitate.
Has anyone encountered something similar before? The key difference between this and other extractions SWIM has done is that SWIM added lye to an unseparated mixture of acidic extract and naphtha. Does the naphtha react with lye when it is exposed to it in aqueous solution?
Here is the procedure SWIM followed:
- loaded 100 mg powdered MHRB into 6 paper tea bags
- twice boiled the bagged MHRB in 1.8L of vinegar solution (approxmiately pH=3, 125 mL 5% vinegar, 1675 mL tap water) for 1 hour at high pressure pressure directly in the stainless steel vessel of a pressure cooker (Instant Pot, 12 psi). Combined the resulting solutions to a combined 3.6 L (crude acidic extract)
- removed the tea bags; two of them had burst and significant sediment had leaked into solution, so SWIM let the crude acidic extract settle for several hours and decanted (decanted acidic extract), leaving a sludge at the bottom; however, lots of sediment remained suspended in solution
- vacuum-filtered the decanted acidic extract through a Buchner funnel with 20-micron pore filter papers (filtered acidic extract). Had to replace paper multiple times due to clogging; however, fine sediment still remained.
- reduced the 3.6 L filtered acidic extract to ~200 mL by boiling (acidic concentrate)
- vacuum-filtered the acidic concentrate through a celite pad to remove fine particles-- even this didn't seem to get all the sediment (filtered acidic concentrate)
- further reduced the filtered acidic concentrate to 150 mL by boiling
- defatted the room-temperature filtered acidic concentrate with ~100 mL of naphtha (defatted acidic concentrate). The naphtha used was clear but had been used on 2 previous extractions in a similar manner (defatting an acidic concentrate)
- mixed another 100 mL clean naphtha into the defatted acidic concentrate for extraction. Shook up separatory funnel to mix the phases. While separation was occurring, realized I had forgotten to basify the solution. Added 8 g crystal lye (calculated to achieve a pH of 12.5) into funnel and stirred. Lye dissolved but phases did not separate (emulsified basic concentrate).
So you can see SWIM's error was forgetting to add lye before performing the extraction. What confuses SWIM is that the extraction naphtha and basic concentrate did not separate when SWIM remembered to add lye. The emulsified basic concentrate was a dark purple-black, and didn't look like the emulsions SWIM has previously encountered. There was no layer separation at all, no bubbles-- just a thick uniform solution.
SWIM tried breaking the emulsion in various ways. In order:
- Heated solution-- this led to what SWIM assumed to be naphtha boiling off (temp stabilized at around 90C while some boiling was occurring), but did not lead to any layer separation.
- Added lots of sea salt (50 g?) to solution. It all dissolved but no layer separation.
- Added an additional 300 mL water. No separation.
- Added an additional 16 g lye. No separation.
- Finally, added an additional 100 mL fresh naphtha. Mixed the naphtha into solution with a magnetic stirrer. This naphtha then reseparated and seemed to take some of the emulsified naphtha with it-- an approximately 130 mL naphtha layer formed.
The formed naphtha layer was darker than any naphtha layer SWIM has seen before in an extraction. It was even kind of purplish, which SWIM has never seen (all the purple tends to remain in the aqueous layer).
SWIM washed this naphtha extract with 75 mL 10% sodium carbonate solution, which removed a fair amount of the coloring but not all of it. SWIM freeze precipitated it and got a mixture of nice white DMT crystals, crystals with purple impurities, and puddles of purplish resin. Note that the purplish impurities were *not* from solid plant material-- there were no visible solids in SWIM's extract.
SWIM is trying to figure out (a) what happened chemically; (b) what the best way is to clean the purple impurities from SWIM's precipitate.
Has anyone encountered something similar before? The key difference between this and other extractions SWIM has done is that SWIM added lye to an unseparated mixture of acidic extract and naphtha. Does the naphtha react with lye when it is exposed to it in aqueous solution?
It makes sense, then, that the acidic bark would be somewhat positively charged and therefore more repellent to the naphtha.