Jarl Von Hoother
Underwater Pyrotechnition Underdog at Large
My thread starts like this...
In Sweden a nineteen year old philosophy student and active file sharer, Isak Gerson who made a website that sanctifies file sharing and downloading as a religion with sole imperative to guarantee everyone the personal exercise of religious freedom to share information with eachother for educational purposes and otherwise which he calls Kopimism. After three applications to the Swedish government agency, Kammarkollegiet. Isak Gerson finally registered Kopimism as a religion that allows the people under Swedens jurisdiction to indeed 'share information' online. After reading this I thought say why cant we legalize DMT under Religious Freedom Restoration Act despite it being a schedual 1. drug if you'd even call it a drug.
Which lead me to the date of August the 11th, 1978 when the US Congress passed the amendment, The American Indian Religious Freedom Act which served to protect Native American cultures one right among others to use ceremonial objects that they deem sacred. According to the indigenous people of Pueblo and other Native Indians whose traditions have been shaped by the ceremonious use of peyote during ceremonies of worship since times immemorial. By suspension of federal law Peyote under religious freedom ordained by the Native American Church allowing possession, distribution and use of Peyote
Than I ran into this article:
One Religion being such as Uniao do Vegetal or UDV in short being practiced within the Santo Daime Church which takes it's spiritual origin from the Brazilian rain forest and spreading through out the continents including the US. The União do Vegetal derives from a Christianity's roots as it's central religious component and the ceremonial ingestion of psychoactive DMT containing plants in the Ayahuasca brew. Whose strong ritual beliefs derive from it's purported healing powers and to gain self-knowledge which is commonly considered as sacred object throughout the ceremony.
The DEA has been interfering with the harmless UDV religion as apart of their sham effort on 'The war on drugs'. After returning to the supreme court the UDV requested that the DEA to stop the harassment and unconstitutional prosecution were asked once again on February 21st, 2006 to meet in The US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided most of the points of contention in favor of the UDV the United Nations Convention of Pschotropic Substances does NOT control Ayahuasca because it derived from plants. But in 1997 during the case of Boenre vs Flores The supreme court realized that RFRA does not apply to states, Allowing DMT to be either be regulated or banned and thereby enabling possibility that Ayahuasca containing DMT could be protected by federal law.
So in conclusion of the UDV's sacrament.
Subsequent to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court (that the United States government had failed to prove a "compelling interest" to justify prohibiting the religious use of Hoasca by the UDV) in 2006, the case proceeded through four more years of litigation in U.S. federal court. At issue were the regulatory conditions related to the importation, storage and distribution of its religious sacrament to which UDV members would be required to adhere. In July of 2010, after almost 10 years from the time the UDV's complaint against the United States government was first filed, an accord was finally reached between the church and federal drug control authorities, bringing a conclusion to the case.
The comprehensive detailed agreement, which is 24 pages long, defines the terms whereby the UDV can continue its religious practice within the United States territory at the same time as it gives the Drug Control authorities in the United States a degree of administrative supervision over the use of a substance that courts affirmed as "controlled" under that nation's drug laws. The agreement, following the principles outlined through the decisions made by the U.S. courts over the years of legal dispute, defines the procedures the UDV must follow to be able to import, package, distribute and utilize the sacrament of Hoasca within the registration requirements of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.
Although the UDV had resolutely argued that the regulatory involvement by the federal government in a religious practice was impermissible under the Constitution of the United States, concerns about the use of tea led the federal judge administering the case to conclude that some degree of control over the importation, storage and use of the church's sacrament was desirable. Rather than define the terms of such an arrangement through a judicial order, however, the judge and his designated subordinates supervised negotiations between church officials and their lawyers, and representatives from the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, the DEA and the United States Department of Justice in reaching an accord that all parties could accept. [Jeffrey Bronfman, Feb 2011]
but, The favor went to UVD because of our Constitution:
Under the United States Constitution, the The Establishment Clause and the The Free Exercise Clause read together " Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
And So my main point is this why don't we at DMT Nexus Forum make ALL potential forms DMT regulated only if it used by religious members under safety restrictions, using the trials of Dr. Rick Strassman 's research in that touting health reports. The fact that the UN's International Convention of Psychotropic Substances did not ban the UDV's sacramental brew is due to the religious preparation. So... SERIOUSLY WHY DON'T APPLY TO THE SUPREME COURT IN FAVOR OF TURNING OUR BELOVED DMT EDUCATION INTO A RELIGION CALLED "TEK" WHICH INVOLVING A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY WHICH CAN ARGUABLY INCLUDE 'TEK WORK' STARTING WITH PLANT BASED SPICE BEFORE INDISCRIMINATE PREPEARTION, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THEREOF AS APART OF AN INDEPENDENT RELIGION???
So will somebody please get a plea to petition across Nexus or do I have to do it myself.
Thank You for reading
Sincerely, Jarl Von Hoother
Sources of information go to the credit of:
The us constitution
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
In Sweden a nineteen year old philosophy student and active file sharer, Isak Gerson who made a website that sanctifies file sharing and downloading as a religion with sole imperative to guarantee everyone the personal exercise of religious freedom to share information with eachother for educational purposes and otherwise which he calls Kopimism. After three applications to the Swedish government agency, Kammarkollegiet. Isak Gerson finally registered Kopimism as a religion that allows the people under Swedens jurisdiction to indeed 'share information' online. After reading this I thought say why cant we legalize DMT under Religious Freedom Restoration Act despite it being a schedual 1. drug if you'd even call it a drug.
Which lead me to the date of August the 11th, 1978 when the US Congress passed the amendment, The American Indian Religious Freedom Act which served to protect Native American cultures one right among others to use ceremonial objects that they deem sacred. According to the indigenous people of Pueblo and other Native Indians whose traditions have been shaped by the ceremonious use of peyote during ceremonies of worship since times immemorial. By suspension of federal law Peyote under religious freedom ordained by the Native American Church allowing possession, distribution and use of Peyote
Than I ran into this article:
One Religion being such as Uniao do Vegetal or UDV in short being practiced within the Santo Daime Church which takes it's spiritual origin from the Brazilian rain forest and spreading through out the continents including the US. The União do Vegetal derives from a Christianity's roots as it's central religious component and the ceremonial ingestion of psychoactive DMT containing plants in the Ayahuasca brew. Whose strong ritual beliefs derive from it's purported healing powers and to gain self-knowledge which is commonly considered as sacred object throughout the ceremony.
The DEA has been interfering with the harmless UDV religion as apart of their sham effort on 'The war on drugs'. After returning to the supreme court the UDV requested that the DEA to stop the harassment and unconstitutional prosecution were asked once again on February 21st, 2006 to meet in The US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided most of the points of contention in favor of the UDV the United Nations Convention of Pschotropic Substances does NOT control Ayahuasca because it derived from plants. But in 1997 during the case of Boenre vs Flores The supreme court realized that RFRA does not apply to states, Allowing DMT to be either be regulated or banned and thereby enabling possibility that Ayahuasca containing DMT could be protected by federal law.
So in conclusion of the UDV's sacrament.
Subsequent to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court (that the United States government had failed to prove a "compelling interest" to justify prohibiting the religious use of Hoasca by the UDV) in 2006, the case proceeded through four more years of litigation in U.S. federal court. At issue were the regulatory conditions related to the importation, storage and distribution of its religious sacrament to which UDV members would be required to adhere. In July of 2010, after almost 10 years from the time the UDV's complaint against the United States government was first filed, an accord was finally reached between the church and federal drug control authorities, bringing a conclusion to the case.
The comprehensive detailed agreement, which is 24 pages long, defines the terms whereby the UDV can continue its religious practice within the United States territory at the same time as it gives the Drug Control authorities in the United States a degree of administrative supervision over the use of a substance that courts affirmed as "controlled" under that nation's drug laws. The agreement, following the principles outlined through the decisions made by the U.S. courts over the years of legal dispute, defines the procedures the UDV must follow to be able to import, package, distribute and utilize the sacrament of Hoasca within the registration requirements of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.
Although the UDV had resolutely argued that the regulatory involvement by the federal government in a religious practice was impermissible under the Constitution of the United States, concerns about the use of tea led the federal judge administering the case to conclude that some degree of control over the importation, storage and use of the church's sacrament was desirable. Rather than define the terms of such an arrangement through a judicial order, however, the judge and his designated subordinates supervised negotiations between church officials and their lawyers, and representatives from the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, the DEA and the United States Department of Justice in reaching an accord that all parties could accept. [Jeffrey Bronfman, Feb 2011]
but, The favor went to UVD because of our Constitution:
Under the United States Constitution, the The Establishment Clause and the The Free Exercise Clause read together " Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
And So my main point is this why don't we at DMT Nexus Forum make ALL potential forms DMT regulated only if it used by religious members under safety restrictions, using the trials of Dr. Rick Strassman 's research in that touting health reports. The fact that the UN's International Convention of Psychotropic Substances did not ban the UDV's sacramental brew is due to the religious preparation. So... SERIOUSLY WHY DON'T APPLY TO THE SUPREME COURT IN FAVOR OF TURNING OUR BELOVED DMT EDUCATION INTO A RELIGION CALLED "TEK" WHICH INVOLVING A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY WHICH CAN ARGUABLY INCLUDE 'TEK WORK' STARTING WITH PLANT BASED SPICE BEFORE INDISCRIMINATE PREPEARTION, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THEREOF AS APART OF AN INDEPENDENT RELIGION???
So will somebody please get a plea to petition across Nexus or do I have to do it myself.
Thank You for reading
Sincerely, Jarl Von Hoother
Sources of information go to the credit of:
The us constitution
American Indian Religious Freedom Act - Wikipedia
Native American Church - Wikipedia
Rick Strassman - Wikipedia
Santo Daime - Wikipedia
Erowid Ayahuasca Vaults : UDV Wins Supreme Court Decision on Preliminary Injunction
The UDV Church won a decision in the Supreme Court of the United States backing a preliminary injunction which allows them to use their DMT-containing hoasca tea.
www.erowid.org
