I know I'm on the dmt-nexus.. but from the beginning I felt this was a community that respected all entheogens to a great degree. Lately I've been noticing a strong dmt-elitarianism (not to say this is a recent phenomenon, but only I've noticed it recently) with some members and wanted to ask about it. People are stating that dmt, like no other substance, has this transformative effect on them, healing, revealing, etc. They talk about other entheogens like they are toys or lacking the depth or quality that dmt somehow has.
While I don't want to say dmt is nothing special - because it definitely is special to me - I still can't elevate it above the other two entheogens I've tried so far - shrooms and acid. I've had truly strange, truly transformative, severely harrowing, utterly spiritual, and simply amazing journeys with both of these, and there is just NO WAY I could say that they lack depth or are like *psychedelic candy* or *toys*.
I was wondering how other members felt about this - both about the other entheogens and the attitude of dmt-as-the-holy-grail. Any and all replies are welcome.
cheers & love
Enoon
While I don't want to say dmt is nothing special - because it definitely is special to me - I still can't elevate it above the other two entheogens I've tried so far - shrooms and acid. I've had truly strange, truly transformative, severely harrowing, utterly spiritual, and simply amazing journeys with both of these, and there is just NO WAY I could say that they lack depth or are like *psychedelic candy* or *toys*.
I was wondering how other members felt about this - both about the other entheogens and the attitude of dmt-as-the-holy-grail. Any and all replies are welcome.
cheers & love
Enoon