My experience has been almost the opposite of Snozz’s. Lower doses of sublingual harmalas (let’s say 75mg or less) produce no nausea at all. Higher doses (I’ve only gone as high as about 100mg sublingually) can cause nausea. Oral harmalas, even with fairly low doses (less than 175mg) cause distracting nausea. (I'm sure I'd be violently ill for a long time if I took 400mg oral harmalas!)tele said:SnozzleBerry said:50mg of sublingual harmalas hits me rather intensely and gives nausea. As I can eat 400mg of fb with zero nausea...I find sublingual to be a waste and not worth attempting to dose high with. I much prefer the synergy with spice when taken orally...if I want to smoke it with cannabis/spice, it hits similar to sublingual, but the dosing and/or inhaling allows me to moderate the amount I take in at any given time.
Do you mean you find sublingual harmalas to be a waste with high dose or in general?
How does caapi alkaloids compare sublingually vs orally?
And why does one have to take so much more orally than sublingually?
If one takes sublingually, is the effect basically working only for smoked DMT?
I am really interested in the differences of oral and sublingual caapi and their effects on freebased DMT.
As sublingual caapi have blown my mind with the D
Higher dose sublingual harmalas don’t seem to add much for me – anything over 25mg or so is overkill. In fact, with higher doses, it seems that the harmalas predominate to the point where higher doses of DMT are needed for breakthrough. I haven’t experimented with this much, so I can’t provide any numbers.
I find sublingual harmalas combined with a sub-breakthrough or light breakthrough dose of DMT to be very similar to pharma, but much shorter – for me, 45 minutes vs. 6+ hours. Sublingual harmalas will not inhibit MAO in the digestive system, so they aren’t effective with oral DMT.
Oddly enough, I’ve never tried vaporized DMT with oral harmalas.