Wikipedia said:
A noble savage is a literary stock character who embodies the concept of an idealized indigene, outsider, or "other" who has not been "corrupted" by civilization, and therefore symbolizes humanity's innate goodness.
I'll start by saying I have absolutely seen miraculous healings take place within the context of ceremony. I have been honored to spend time with healers of many different cultural backgrounds and traditions, and I've been witness their techniques and treatments first hand. I know well the experiential meaning of words like magic and medicine as they are implemented around the sacred fire.
I have met more than my fair share of conmen and charlatans as well, those people playing shaman with guru complexes and easy payment plans. I have also discovered that the line between the two may not be as clear cut as you would expect. At the end of the day we are all humans with our own agendas and ideals, frailties and foibles. We are all working off incomplete information and making it up as we go along. As Jerry put it "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right." Keep in mind that the fictional shaman Don Juan Matus has a better track record of turning the world on to the wisdom traditions than any authentic curer or medicine person living today.
I have found some consistencies between those who I would deem authentic practitioners however. The first is that they despise the term "shaman" or even the softer terms such as "medicine man", "curer", or "healer" and would never refer to themselves in that way. Every one I've met that is authentically the 'real deal' has always stressed that they are just ordinary people, not special in any way. So, that's criteria #1 in my book, humility. Next is kinda along the same lines, none would ever make any of the kind of claims I see in this thread either of the "I can heal you" type or the "I can't heal you" type, they will simply wait for you to ask for help and get to work without any promises or expectations. That is criteria #2, integrity. Lastly, of course they would never ask for or expect any kind of compensation for their work, they will never turn anyone away, nor will they turn down any offering given them in gratitude. Criteria #3, no price tags.
In many ways the technology of tradition is still far ahead of anything we can measure in the laboratory. There is real wisdom to be found in the footprints of our ancestors. That said, those nuggets of gold are buried in mountains of quaint superstitious baggage. As an example, while any self respecting cactiphile would be quick to espouse the value of eating peyote and drumming in the tipi all night long, most would be hard pressed to also adopt the belief, traditional amongst the Dine, that a living cactus should NEVER be kept indoors and to do so is seriously bad juju. No sustaining the work with hydro loph teks in a Navajo household.
This segways nicely into my next topic. Let's talk about bloodlines, birthrights, and the oh so politically incorrect act of cultural appropriation. I ask the question does your blood dictate your birthright? Or does your environment? Does a child born of Lakota parents in Iquitos have the right to perform the Sun Dance? Does a child born of Peruvian parents in Tulsa, Oklahoma have the right to drink ayahuasca? Should a caucasian born in Farmington, AZ only be expected to tell Norse myths around the campfire and be forbidden from telling the story of the formation of Shiprock? If a Caucasian man burns palo santo and drinks ayahuasca in his backyard is that cultural appropriation? How about if a Latino man drinks Budweiser and watches football in his recliner?
At this point ALL cultures are threatened. Disillusioned first worlders are seeking traditional roots in small villages in droves hastening the encroachment of capitalist values into these places. In response, droves of third worlders are seeking iPhones and energy drinks in the big cities further perpetuating the loss of the languages, myths, songs, and stories that sustained these cultures as unique and sovereign. If the diversity of these cultures is to be preserved, it's going to take a cooperative effort that goes beyond selling the medicine show to health tourists from half a world away. It requires making it as worthwhile for young people to learn their grandmothers language as it would be for them to learn Java. Even with a concerted attempt to create such a movement, it's likely already too late to archive anything but the faintest bastardized glimmer of the rich and complex cosmologies that gave life to these traditions.
Which brings us to what I believe it is Annie has been speaking to all along, practicality. What good is it for the Amazonian shaman to be able to predict the movements of the game when their migration route has been fenced off and bulldozed into a soy farm to feed cattle to supply the Mcdonalds going in downriver? Do you honestly believe there is a single person in the jungle who would not glady trade their pounding rock and decaying aluminum pot for a for a Vitamix and an All-American stainless steel pressure cooker? Don't get me wrong, I don't necessarily buy the idea that this kind of "progress" is really a good thing, but I do think we need to step back and take a realistic view of what is happening here and work from where we actually are, rather than some kind of idealized noble savage fantasy about how things used to be or how things should be.
Culture is not your friend, all this work to preserve the very thing that keeps us divided is simply working against us working together to stop the ongoing devastation of our collective life support systems. There is no room for saying this is only for indians and this only for asians and this only for africans and this is only for whites. Now is the time for us to bring everything we got to the table and try to create some kind of synthesis between all our advanced technological knowledge and all our ancient wisdom into a working model to stop this psychopathic kamakazi dive into species extinction.
I think we are catching a glimpse of the possibilities available to us in the festival movement. Take the ritual of dancing to a drum beat and blow it up to 100,000 watts. Take the pilgrimage of the pow wow or tribal meetup and blow it up half a million people strong. Take a disenfranchised youth culture, give them all night ceremonies and psychoactive chemicals and do you not find that the rave is but the future reflection of the antiquated religion?
Who says we can't use FMRI to verify what the curandero sees when he drinks the medicine and looks into your body? Isn't it much moar effective to do a plant dieta with an electric juicer than an old pot and polluted river water? Isn't the placebo effect just what we would call magic being demonstrated under controlled experimental conditions? Is there really a conflict at the level of the evidence, or is it all ideological? Can't we have the best of both worlds and create healing on every level of this fractal universe?