grollum
Rising Star
doubledog said:Water pulls much more unwanted stuff than ethanol. This stuff is mainly pectin-like heteropolysacharide, mucilage responsible for snottines of cactus.
You can have 30g or even more mucilage in 100g of cactus powder, and you will extract it with water.
I did some experiments and resin made with water only is quite low in mescaline, with cactus containing 0,6% it was only 2%.
Ethanol pull lower amount of mucilage, but on the other hand it pulls chlorophyll fraction (quite nasty stuff, with bitter/adstringent taste, definitely something I do not want to consume). Water does not pull this fraction.
Resin made by ethanol only is stronger, maybe 4%.
By using ethanol first, you avoid to extract pectin, by dissolving this resin in water afterwards you get rid of this chlorophyll stuff.
Resin made by use of ethanol and then water could be 8% mescaline.
You can use water first and ethanol next, but then you have to deal with the snot. This means lot of water and lot of time for evaporation.
By ethanol, I mean 85-90% ethanol with some water.
Almost all complications in cactus extractions are caused by the pectin. That's the reason you have to boil it for long time and use lot of water (for tea preparation) or use lot of base (in STB), it is also the cause of emulsions with nonpolar liquid.
Thank you for the explanation. Especially the point with the chronology was enlightend. I think I now understand. When I followed your words right, wouldn't it be best to use as pure as possible ethanol for the job? Or is the percentage of water in there neglectable because you don't boil it and 3 days is not long enough for the water to do its job? Where I live ethanol has huge taxes on it so isopropanol 99,9 % is the cheapest to get. I read this is doing the Job as well but might take more time?
